Offering flood prevention solutions using remote sensing and approaches integrating fuzzy logic and agent-based modeling

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student in Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

10.22131/sepehr.2022.252772

Abstract

Extended abstract
Introduction
Population growth, urbanization and land use change in recent decades have made floods one of the most devastating natural disasters in the world. Therefore, understanding this phenomenon, its effects and methods used to deal with it is considered to be among the most important issues crisis management planners and policymakers in urban and rural areas should pay attention to. Iran faces many natural disasters among which flood is one of the most serious ones. Monitoring and controlling accidents, assessing damages and providing relief are among the main concerns of government and crisis management experts. Continuous monitoring before the occurrence, and accurate assessment during and after the event can decrease damages to human and natural resources. Preventing flood related hazards, organizing and managing flood water in channels and ultimately improving channels require identifying and determining flood zones.
 
Materials & Methods
Agent-based modeling (ABM) provides simulation and abstract systems used to identify patterns of land forms in the study area. As a new approach, agent-based modeling is used to develop simulation tools for complex phenomena in various fields such as natural disasters, biological studies and relief provision in flood occurrences. In fact, agent-based modeling (ABM) has been increasingly used to confront the risk of flood and its challenges in recent years. The present study applies fuzzy inference approach (using parameters affecting the occurrence of flood and remote sensing data) and agent-based modeling to prepare a flood risk map and provide a deterrent solution for flood risk management and decision making before the occurrence. In the fuzzy inference system, various maps are prepared showing parameters affecting the occurrence of floods such as slope, soil type and rivers. Then, Fuzzy Overlay model is used to define the flood risk zones and overlay the fuzzy parameters. The present study applies fuzzy gamma operator with a coefficient of 0.8 in the final fuzzy overlay calculation.
 
Results & Discussion
Comparing the results obtained from overlaid maps reveals that most flood plains are located in areas covered with Affisols (clay-rich soil) and low-lying arable lands and orchards. In agent-based modeling, GIS plugin of NetLogo was used to investigate the flood phenomenon based on the digital elevation model of the area. In this model, raindrop cycle was simulated in the DEM raster layer of Gilan. DEM layer can be used to calculate the slope (vertical angle) and slope direction (horizontal angle) of the ground surface. Simulated images shows the movement and accumulation of agents along the rivers and their surroundings and in low altitude areas. Analysis confirms the risk of floods in rivers and low-lying areas. Finally, georeferenced images of points in risk of possible flood (agents in the slopes of the study area), land use map and soil cover map can be overlaid to evaluate the obtained results. Results indicate that the highest number of agents (white markings on the map) are located in agricultural land use covered with Affisols while a relatively moderate number of agents are located in agricultural lands covered with Inceptisols. As previously mentioned, these agents simulate the amount of runoff accumulation due to atmospheric precipitation. Results indicate that precipitation models simulated using artificial intelligence lead to almost the same result Fuzzy analysis method shows (regarding the prediction of flood occurrence).
 
Conclusion
Finally, these two approaches are compared and their functions are examined. It should be noted that multi-criteria methods such as fuzzy inference approach has a higher level of complexity and accuracy, while methods based on artificial intelligence and agent-based modeling are faster. On the other hand, agent-based modelling method use relatively ready programs and thus has a lower level of complexity. The level of accuracy in this method is also lower than the fuzzy logic method.

Keywords


1- سازمان برنامه و بودجه کشور، راهنمای تهیه نقشه‌های خطرپذیری سیلاب، ضابطه شماره 821
2- محمودزاده، باکویی؛ حسن، مائده؛ 1397، پهنه‌بندی سیلاب با استفاده از تحلیل فازی (مطالعه موردی: شهر ساری)، مجله مخاطرات طبیعی، دوره هفتم، شماره 18
3- مختاری، رحیمی؛ حسین، داریوش؛ 1395، پهنه‌بندی خطر سیل در مراکز انسانی و اقتصادی استان خراسان جنوبی با استفاده از منطق فازی، نشریه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی محیطی، شماره 1 بهار 1395
4- مصطفی‌زاده، مهری؛ رئوف، سونیا؛ 1397، روند تغییرات ضریب سیلابی در ایستگاه‌های هیدرومتری استان اردبیل. پژوهشنامه مدیریت حوزه آبخیز.
5- ملاشاهی، امان‌محمد؛ شکوفه، کلته؛ 1397، تحلیل فراوانی وقوع سیل در استان گیلان، سیزدهمین همایش ملی علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری ایران و سومین همایش ملی صیانت از منابع طبیعی و محیط زیست 10 و 11 مهرماه، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
6- ملایی، داوری، انصاری؛ زینب، کامران، حسین؛ 1398،   تهیه نقشه خطر سیلاب با استفاده از مدل هیدرولیکی و اطلاعات ژئومورفولوژیک مطالعه موردی: «مخروطه‌افکنه فریزی» در استان خراسان رضوی، مجله پژوهش آب ایران، بهار 1398
7- یمانی، عنایتی؛ مجتبی، مریم 1384، ارتباط ویژگی‌های ژئومرفولوژیک حوضه‌ها و قابلیت سیل‌خیزی (تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌های سیل از طریق مقایسه ژئومرفولوژیک حوضه‌های فشند و بهجت آباد)،  پژوهش‌های جغرافیایی ـ شماره54 ،زمستان 1384
8- Andrew T. Crooks and Christian J.E. Castle,2012, the Integration of Agent-Based Modelling and Geographical Information for Geospatial Simulation
9- Binh Thai Pham, Chinh Luu, Tran Van Phong, Huu Duy Nguyen, Hiep Van Le, Thai Quoc Tran, Huong Thu Ta, Indra Prakash, Flood risk assessment using hybrid artificial intelligence models integrated with multi-criteria decision analysis in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam, Journal of Hydrology, Volume 592, 2021
10- Büchele, B, et al. 2006, ‘Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of
Extreme events and associated risks’, Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, vol. 6, No. 4
11- Dilley, M, Chen, RS, Deichmann, U, 2005, Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis, the
World Bank, Hazard Management Unit, Washington, DC.
12- Dubbelboer, J., Nikolic, I., Jenkins, K., Hall, J., 2017. An agent-based model of flood risk
and insurance. JASSS 20, 6.
13- Fengyuan Zhang, MinChena, DanielP.Ames, ChaoranShen, SongshanYue, YongningWen, GuonianLü , 2019,  Design and development of a service-oriented wrapper system for sharing and reusing distributed geoanalysis models on the web, Environmental Modelling & Software
14- Flávio E.A.; Horita, A. Lívia C. Degrossi, S. Eduardo M, Mendiondo, J. 2015. Development of a spatial decision support system for flood risk management in Brazil that combines volunteered geographic information with wireless sensor networks. Computers &Geosciences, 80: 84 -94
15- Krzysztof Janowicz,Song Gao, Grant McKenzie, Yingjie Hu, &Budhendra BhadurI,  2020, GeoAI: spatially explicit artificial intelligence techniques for geographic knowledge discovery and beyond, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Volume 34,
16- LuZhuoa, DaweiHanb, 2020, Agent-based modelling and flood risk management: A compendious literature review, Journal of Hydrology ,Volume 591, 125600
17- Macal, C.M., North, M.J., 2010. Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. J of
Sim 4, 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2010.3.
18- Mostafazadeh, R., Sadoddin, A., Bahremand, A. et al. 2017, Scenario analysis of flood control structures using a multi-criteria decision-making technique in Northeast Iran. Nat Hazards 87, 1827–1846
19-  M.Di Matteo, R.Liang, H.R.Maier, M.A.Thyer, A.R.Simpson, G.C.Dandy, B.Ernstc, 2019, Controlling rainwater storage as a system: An opportunity to reduce urban flood peaks for rare, long duration storms, Environmental Modelling & Software ,Volume 111, Pages 34-41
20- Richard J. Dawson, Roger Peppe , Miao Wang, 2011, An agent-based model for risk-based flood incident management, Natural Hazards volume 59, pages167–189
21- Richard Wen, Songnian Li,2021, A review of the use of geosocial media data in agent-based models for studying urban systems
22- Vatanfada, J. 2009, “Flood management of Iran (country report)”, Flood Prevention Committee.
23- Yared Abayneh, AbebeaAmineh, GhorbanibIgor, NikolicbZoran, Vojinovicacde, ArlexSancheza , 2019, A coupled flood-agent-institution modelling (CLAIM) framework for urban flood risk management, Environmental Modelling & Software, Volume 111, Pages 483-492
24-  Yitea Seneshaw Getahun, Sintayehu Legesse Gebre, 2015,  Flood Hazard Assessment and Mapping of Flood Inundation Area of the Awash River Basin in Ethiopia using GIS and HEC-GeoRAS/HEC-RAS Model. Civil and Environmental Engineering
25- https://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/docs