Scientific- Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR)

Scientific- Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR)

Modeling of ionosphere TEC using gated recurrent unit neural network model and comparison against other models

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Seyyed Reza Ghaffari-Razin 1
Navid Hooshangi 2
1 Associate professor,, Department of surveying engineering, Faculty of geoscience engineering, Arak University of Technology
2 Assistant professor, ,Department of surveying engineering, Faculty of geoscience engineering, Arak University of Technology
10.22131/sepehr.2024.2005444.2989
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction:
The ionosphere is a layer of the earth's atmosphere that extends from an altitude of 80 km to more than 1000 km above the earth. Due to its electrical properties, this layer of the atmosphere has very important and fundamental effects on the waves passing through it. The ionosphere exhibits temporary and intermittent variations such as daily, 27-day, seasonal, six-monthly, annual and 11-year changes. Ionosphere disturbances can cause distance error, cycle slips and phase fluctuations of satellite systems signals, which leads to degradation of the performance, accuracy and reliability of these systems. A parameter that can be used to study the ionosphere is the total electron content (TEC). This parameter is the sum of free electrons in a cylinder with a cross section of one square meter between the satellite and the receiver in the ground and its unit is ele./m2. If the TEC is along the vertical (zenith direction), it is called VTEC. Usually, TEC is expressed in terms of TECU, which is equal to 1016 ele/m2. Various methods have been developed to model the TEC. The simplest and at the same time the most practical method is to use observations of two-frequency receivers. If there is a proper station distribution, it is possible to obtain accurate TEC and model the ionosphere.
Materials & Methods
In this paper, the idea of using the gated recurrent unit (GRU) for spatio-temporal modeling of the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) is proposed as a new model. In this type of neural network model, unlike normal neural networks, there is no gradient vanishing problem and it is very simple in terms of computations. The efficiency of the new model has been evaluated using the observations of 15 global positioning system (GPS) stations in the northwest of Iran. To calculate the accuracy of the GRU model, two interior and three exterior control stations are considered. It should be noted that the training of GRU model is done using the parameters of longitude and latitude of the GPS station, day of year (DOY), time (universal time), geomagnetic indices AP, KP and DST and solar activity index (F10.7). Also, the TEC in the direction of the zenith (VTEC) related to the input parameters are considered as the desired output. The results of the new model are compared with the results of artificial neural network (ANN), global ionosphere maps (GIM) and IRI2016 model. Also, the effect of the modeled TEC in precise point positioning (PPP) has been investigated.
Results & Discussion
After training ANN and GRU models and selecting the optimal structure, these models can be used to estimate of VTEC. In this step, with the trained models, the VTEC is estimated at interior control stations and compared with the VTEC obtained from GPS. In the evaluation step of interior control stations, the averaged value of root mean square error (RMSE) of ANN, GRU, GIM and IRI models is to 2.42, 1.76, 3.02 and 6.91 TECU, respectively. Also, the averaged relative error of the models is 12.93%, 10.75%, 16.82% and 26.56%, respectively. In the control stations outside the GPS network area (exterior control stations), two scenarios were investigated: using the observations of these stations in the training step and not using the observations in the training. The evaluations showed that if the observations of exterior control stations are used in the training step of ANN and GRU models, the error of these models will be reduced. In all three exterior control stations, the accuracy of GRU model was higher than other models. The analysis of positioning error by PPP method also showed that by using the GRU model, positioning accuracy has improved by 7 to 45 mm. After evaluating the accuracy of the new model in interior and exterior control stations, the VTEC time series is estimated with the new model and compared with the time series obtained from other models and GPS. This comparison showed that the time series obtained from the GRU model correctly models the VTEC variations in both high and low solar and geomagnetic activities.
Conclusion
In this paper, the gated recurrent unit (GRU) neural network model was used for the first time in Iran for the spatio-temporal modeling of the total electron content of the ionosphere. In this model, unlike standard neural network models, there is no gradient vanishing problem, and as a result, the computation speed and accuracy of the model have increased. The results of this paper showed that the GRU model has the ability to estimate the spatio-temporal variations of VTEC with very high accuracy and can replace global and empirical models in the study area of this research.
Keywords
Ionosphere
TEC
GPS
GRU
Northwest Iran
Subjects
1- Ansari, K., Kumar Panda, S., Corumluoglu, O., 2018, Mathematical modeling of ionospheric TEC from Turkish permanent GNSS Network (TPGN) observables during 2009–2017 and predictability of NeQuick and Kriging models. Astrophys Space Sci 363:42.
2- Bilitza, D., Reinisch, B. W., 2008, International reference ionosphere 2007: Improvements and new parameters. Advances in space research, 42(4), 599-609.
3- Cander, R., 1998, Artificial neural network applications in ionospheric studies, Annali di Geofisica, Vol.5-6.
4- Ciraolo, L., Azpilicueta, F., Brunini, C., Meza, A. and Radicella, S.M., 2007, Calibration errors on experimental slant total electron content (TEC) determined with GPS. Journal of Geodesy, 81(2), pp.111-120.
5- Etemadfard, H., Hossainali, M. M., 2017, Vector ionosphere modeling by vector spherical Slepian base functions. GPS solutions, 21-684-675.
6- Feizi, R., Voosoghi, B., Ghaffari Razin, M. R., 2020, Regional modeling of the ionosphere using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system in Iran. Advances in Space Research 65 (2020) 2515–2528.
7- Ghaffari Razin, M.R., 2015, Development and analysis of 3D ionosphere modeling using base functions and GPS data over Iran. Acta Geod Geophys, 51(1):95-111.
8- Ghaffari Razin, M R., Voosoghi, B., Mohammadzadeh, A., 2015, Efficiency of artificial neural networks in map of total electron content over Iran. Acta Geod Geophys, 51(3):541-555.
9- Ghaffari Razin, S R., Rastbood, A., Hooshangi, N., 2023, Regional application of generalized regression neural network in ionosphere spatiotemporal modeling and forecasting. GPS Solutions (2023) 27:51. 
10- Habarulema, J.B., McKinnell, L.-A., Opperman, B.D.L., 2009, A recurrent neural network approach to quantitatively studying solar wind effects on TEC derived from GPS; preliminary results, Ann. Geophys,  27(11):2111-2125.
11- Haykin, S., 1994, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation, MacMillan College Publishing Co. New York.
12- Inyurt, S., Hasanpour Kashani, M., Sekertekin, A., 2020, Ionospheric TEC forecasting using Gaussian process regression (GPR) and multiple linear regression (MLR) in Turkey. Astrophys. Space Sci. 365, 99 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-020-03817-2.
13- Kyunghyun, C., Merrienboer, V., DZmitry, B., Fethi B., Holger, S., Yoshua, B., 2014, Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation.
14- Liao, X., 2000, Carrier phase based ionosphere recovery over a regional area GPS network. University of Calgary.
15- Liu, Z., Gao, Y., 2003, Ionospheric TEC predictions over a local area GPS reference network. GPS Solutions 8(1):23–29.
16- Leick, A., Rapoport, L., & Tatarnikov, D., 2015, GPS satellite surveying: John Wiley & Sons.
17- Mallika, I.L., Ratnam, D.V., Raman, S., Sivavaraprasad, G., 2020, A new ionospheric model for single frequency GNSS user applications using Klobuchar model driven by auto regressive moving average (SAKARMA) method over Indian region. IEEE Access 8, 54535–54553 (2020a). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS. 2020.2981365.
18- Mars, P., Chen, J., Nambiar, R., Fidler, J., 1996, Learning Algorithms: Theory and Applications in Signal Processing: CRC Press, Inc.
19- Nava, B., Coisson, P., Radicella, S., 2008, A new version of the NeQuick ionosphere electron density model. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physic, 1862-1856,(15)70.
20- Nematipour, P., Raoofian-Naeeni, M., Ghaffari Razin, M.R., 2022, Regional application of C1 finite element interpolation method in modeling of ionosphere total electron content over Europe. Advances in space research.
21- Ratnam, D.V., Vindhya, G., Dabbakuti, J.K., 2017, Ionospheric forecasting model using fuzzy logic-based gradient descent method. Geod. Geodyn. 8, 305–310.
22- Saito, A., Teraishi, S., Ueno, G., Fujita, N., Tsugawa, T., 2007, GPS ionospheric tomography over Japan with constrained least squares method, Eos Trans. AGU, 88(52), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract SA13A1061.
23- Schaer, S.,1999, Mapping and Predicting the Earth’s Ionosphere Using the Global Positioning System, Ph.D. thesis, Astronomical Institute, University of Berne, Berne Switzerland.
24- Seeber, G., 2003, satellite geodesy: foundations. Methods and applications, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, 53.
25- Sekido, M., Kondo, T., Kawai, E., Imae, M., 2003, Evaluation of GPS based ionospheric TEC map by comparing with VLBI data. Radio Sci 38(4):1069. doi:10.1029/2000RS002620
26- Walker, J.K., 1989, Spherical Cap Harmonic Modeling of High Latitude Magnetic Activity and Equivalent Sources with Sparse Observations. Journal of Atmospheric and Terrestrial Physics, 51(2):67-80.
27- Yao, Y., Tang, J., Kong, J., 2015, new ionosphere tomography algorithm with two-grid virtual observations constraints and three-dimensional velocity profile. IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 53(5):2373 – 2383.
28- Yao, Y., Chen, P., Zhang, S., Chen, J., 2013, A new ionospheric tomography model combining pixel-based and function-based models. Advances in Space Research, 52(4):614-621.
29- Yin, P., Mitchell, C.N., Spencer, P.S.J., Foster, J.C., 2004, Ionospheric electron concentration imaging using GPS over the USA during the storm of July 2000. Geophysical Research Letters, 31, L12806.