Geographic Data
Elham Forootan
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction. In recent years, the population growth, the increase in irrigated land and economic development have caused the increase in the demand for groundwater resources all over the world. In arid and semi-arid regions where surface water does not have a significant amount ...
Read More
Extended Abstract
Introduction. In recent years, the population growth, the increase in irrigated land and economic development have caused the increase in the demand for groundwater resources all over the world. In arid and semi-arid regions where surface water does not have a significant amount due to low rainfall and high evapotranspiration, people lives mainly depend on groundwater. As a result, it is necessary to identify the groundwater potential areas and determine its recharge areas using accurate technologies. So, the aim of this research is to compare the method of multi- influencing factors with the fuzzy method for determining the potential of groundwater in a part of Kebar-Fordo watershed, Qom city, Iran.
Materials & Methods. For this purpose, a part of Kebar-Fordo watershed located in Qom province was selected. Six factors layer, viz. slope, annual rainfall, distance from river, geology, soil, and landuse were considered and classified based on groundwater potential susceptibility in different scales. Multi-influencing factor method can determine the groundwater potential of the region by assigning appropriate weight to different effective factors. In this approach, the layers were combined in Arc-GIS after determining the weight of the layers. In the fuzzy method, the layers of six factors were converted to fuzzy based on the linear function, and then the layers were incorporated using the gamma function. Finally, the statistics of observation points and accuracy index were used in order to evaluate the models,
Results & Discussion. The slope map represents that most part of the studied area (78.56%) has a "0-1" class while "1-3", "3-9" and "9-25" slope classes could be observed in 19.97, 1.29 and 0.18% of the total area, respectively. The soil texture has a significant effect on the infiltration and percolation of the surface water movement towards the groundwater. Therefore, in this research, the soil factor has been investigated as one of the input factors to the models. Soils with high permeability are more suitable for groundwater recharge and vice versa. The soil texture of the area consists of sandy loam, loam, sandy clay loam, and clay loam textures, which cover 3.73, 90.72, 0.23, and 5.32% of the total area, respectively, with a rank of four to one for groundwater potential. In this study, geology map showed that Qft2 formation has the largest area (88.98%) and Plc formation is in the second rank (4.9%). Qft1, Qs.d and Mur units have an area of 2.22, 2.12 and 1.10% and the smallest area belongs to OMq formation (0.68%). Also, different types of land use in the study area were agriculture, garden, rangeland, bareland, and resendential area. The land use map showed that the largest area of this area was ariculture landuse (77.18%), while garden and rangeland covered 0.07 and 6.5% of the total area, respectively. Bareland and residential area comprise 2.94%, 13.31% of the total area, respectively. Among the different landuses, agriculture and residential area have the highest and lowest ranks in groundwater recharge. The rainfall map was categorized with four classes. The classes of 140-156, 156-168, 168-182, and 182-203 mm layers include 14.15, 48.92, 21.84 and 15.09% of the total area with the rank of one to four for groundwater recharge, respectively. The map of distance from the stream was divided into four categories: "0-659", "659-1480", "1480-2675" and "2675-4939" meters, which comprise 46.33%, 34.15%, 15.72% and 3.8% of the total area, respectively. In the method of multi influencing factor, the distance from the stream (8.33%) and the geological factor (25%) were the lowest and highest weights. In this regard, the factors of rainfall, slope, soil, landuse have 20.83%, 16.67%, 16.67% and 12.5% weights, respectively. Then, the groundwater potential map was prepared through overlaying in ArcGIS and the studied area was classified into suitable and unsuitable classes. The suitable class covers 75.15% of the studied area and the unsuitable class covers 24.85% of the total area. In the fuzzy method, the unsuitable class comprises 43.63% and suitable class covers 56.37% of the area. In order to evaluate the models, the statistics of the observation points were applied which the accuracy of the multi- influencing factor and fuzzy models was calculated as 71.42 and 78.57%, respectively.
Conclusion. Preparation of groundwater potential map is necessary to adopt management measures of rainfall storage and groundwater recharge in arid and semi-arid regions and it can be used for sustainable management of groundwater resources. The findings of this research revealed both model's accuracy in the studied area.
Elham Forootan
Abstract
Extended AbstractIntroduction. Floods are natural disasters which occurrence causes annual great damage to people and environment around the world. So, specifying flood susceptible land is a necessity to reduce and control destructive impacts. Watershed management implementations could affect runoff ...
Read More
Extended AbstractIntroduction. Floods are natural disasters which occurrence causes annual great damage to people and environment around the world. So, specifying flood susceptible land is a necessity to reduce and control destructive impacts. Watershed management implementations could affect runoff volume and flood occurrence. The goal of this study is to apply the combination of Curve Number method and AHP in Arc-GIS to prepare flood susceptibility map and to investigate the role of biological measures in flood susceptibility of the region through this method and statistical tests.Materials & Methods .For this purpose, Pardisan watershed located in the southern part of Qom city was selected. Ten factors layers viz. drainage density, slope, annual rainfall, distance from river, elevation, flow accumulation, SCS Curve Number, geo infiltration, geomorphology and previous floods were prepared and classified based on flood susceptibility in different scales. Then future Curve Number was determine with assuming the implementation of biological watershed management in different land uses such as rangeland, agriculture, garden and badland. In this study, AHP method in Arc-GIS was used to calculate pairwise comparison and determine the weight of each factor. Overlaying current and future Curve Number layers with nine layers using the weights obtained from the hierarchical analysis method led to the preparation of flood susceptibility maps for pre and post watershed management implementation. Results & DiscussionGeo infiltration map showed the proportion area of “low”, “and “very low” infiltration classes were 4.46% and 16.87%, respectively while moderate and high infiltration classes were 39.75% and 38.92%. Slope map indicates that 0-2%, 2-5%, 5-15%, 15-35% and 35-60% classes comprise 29.87%, 35%, 30.11%, 4.88% and 0.14% of the studied area, respectively. In this region, South parts were steep whereas; north parts were mild. Distance to river is another factor classified in to four groups of 0-500, 500-1000, 1000-3000 and 3000-6500 meter with 38.86%, 24.32%, 29.63% and 7.19% of the region, respectively. Elevation classified map revealed 45.1% of the region were in 900-1200 meter range whereas; 36.4%, 14.8%, 3.6% and 0.1% were in 1200-1500,1500-1800,1800-2100 and 2100-2400 meter classes, respectively. As can be seen in rainfall map, 25.57% of the region was categorized in 140-160 mm rainfall class while 35.41%, 20.59% and 18.43% of the whole area were classified in 160-180,180-200 and 200-250mm groups. In the region, South parts have more rainfall volume than north. Also, flow accumulation map indicated that 96.5%, 1.97%, 1.07%, 0.24% and 0.22% were classified as 0-1500, 1500-5000, 5000-15000, 15000-25000, 25000-100000 values which high flow accumulation pixel range show high flood susceptibility. Drainage density map represents 10.38%, 14.36%, 56.88% and 18.38% of the studied area were grouped in 0-0.05, 0.05-0.07, 0.07-0.09 and 0.09-0.12 classes. Also, Curve Number (SCS) map for garden, cultivated lands, rangelands and badlands shows that 25.54% of the study area was classified as 15-35 CN value while 36.14%, 0.9% and 37.42% were categorized in 35-50, 50-65 and 65-80 classes before performing biological measures. After biological measures in different uses, 15-35 Curve Number values are observed in 36.6% of the area and 35-50, 50-65, 65-80 classes comprise 32.05%, 29% and 2.35% of the study area, respectively. The geomorphological map shows that the class with the highest score is visible in 68.96% of the area, while the classes with the lower scores are observed in 3.07, 18.34, 9.37, and 0.26% of the region, respectively. The past flood zoning map of the region also shows that 22.41% of the region exist in low susceptibility class, 36.15% of the region locates in the medium susceptibility class and 41.44% is in the high sensitivity class. For AHP approach, the calculated consistency ratio of this study was less than 0.1. Therefore; the compatibility between ten selected factors was acceptable. AHP results showed that the Curve Number factor has the highest weight percentage (27.44) whereas; the geo-infiltration has the lowest weight percentage (3.20). Comparison of flooding classes for pre and post water management implementation shows that high and medium flooding classes will decrease by 7.3 and 39.7% and low and very low susceptibility classes will increase by 22.18 and 24.82 %, respectively due to the implementation of biological watershed management measures. Also, Sign and Wilcoxon statistical tests indicated the existence of significance difference in flood classes’ for pre and after implementing biological watershed management. ConclusionFlood susceptibility map provision is a necessity in arid and semi-arid regions due to insufficient vegetation cover. The results of this study indicate positive effects of biological watershed management in decreasing flood vulnerability. These findings can be considered for future planning of the region and help watershed managers for optimal utilization of water and soil resources and reduction of flood damage.
