Mohsen Abedi; Mohammad SaadatSeresht; Reza Shahhoseini
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Nowadays, updating information collected from urban areas is of great importance, since it provides the basis for many fields of study such as land cover changes and environmental studies. Remote sensing provides an opportunity to obtain information from urban areas ...
Read More
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Nowadays, updating information collected from urban areas is of great importance, since it provides the basis for many fields of study such as land cover changes and environmental studies. Remote sensing provides an opportunity to obtain information from urban areas at different levels of accuracy while widely used in various change detection applications. Detecting changes in buildings as one of the most important features in urban areas is of particular importance. Powerful and expensive processing systems are the only way to process large volume of remote sensing and photogrammetry data generated by the ever increasing number of sources to which laymen do not have access. The present study has applied deep learning methods and high computational volume of data processing in free clouds to make this possible for the public.
Materials & Methods
Two case studies have been selected in the present study. The first includes DSM and Orthophoto images captured by drones from Mashhad in 2011 and 2016. DSM and Orthophoto images in the second case study has been collected by drones from Aqda in Yazd province in 2015 and 2018. In accordance with the type of data used and high computational volume used for processing, the present study has applied fuzzy clustering method to detect buildings with a high computational speed and deep learning method to detect their changes. Object-based method and fuzzy logic theory have been used in the first step to classify features and detect buildings. In the second step, deep learning method and DSM differentiation method were also used to detect changes in buildings and evaluate results obtained from deep learning method. In the first step, buildings were detected using descriptors extracted from terrestrial and non-terrestrial features, and related decisions were made using fuzzy logic. In the second step, DSM differentiation method has applied the masks extracted from buildings in both epochs on the related DSMs to find their difference and detects changes using an elevation threshold. In deep learning method, a convolutional neural network model was trained to detect changes in buildings during both epochs. Using the DSM of buildings in both epochs and a part of their interface, the network input layers were generated for training. Changes detected in the buildings by the differentiation method were also introduced as the output layer. Following the training and introducing the entire interface in both epochs as the input layer, the trained neural network has detect changes in the buildings. The same process was performed once more using the difference between two DSMs. In other words, a single input layer was used in the network and the rest of the process was the same as before. Finally, changes detected by the neural network was compared with changes detected in the DSM differentiation method
Results & Discussion
In the first step, buildings were detected and images were classified in accordance with the fuzzy logic. The overall accuracy of the first epoch classification in Mashhad equaled 94.6% indicating higher acuracy of object-based methods as compared to pixel-based methods. The overall accuracy of first epoch in Aqda equaled 95.5%. Neural network method detected changes in buildings with an overall accuracy of 90%. In accordance with the ground truth used in network training (both using DSMs as the input layer and the difference between the epochs as the input layer), results indicated that deep learning method is highly accurate in one-dimensional convolution mode. Moreover, the second step has applied the difference between DSMs in the two epochs and thus, many areas lacking a change in height were removed in both epochs and the network was trained more appropriately and accurately.
Conclusion
Necessity of extracting features, especially urban features such as buildings and identifying their changes over time have been investigated in the present study. Due to the high computational volume of modern remote sensing and photogrammetry data and highly expensive systems required for their processing, a new method was presented in the present study to solve this problem. Considering the type of data used and the complexity of features, object-based methods were selected instead of pixel-based methods to identify features and buildings. Deep learning method was used to detect changes in buildings. The method was also compared with DSM differentiation method. A one-dimensional convolutional neural network was used in the deep learning method. Two different modes were used in the network to train and predict changes. In the first, DSMs extracted from the buildings in each epoch were used as the input layer, while in the second one, the difference between DSMs were introduced as a single input layer to the network and the network was trained in accordance with the ground truth collected from areas with and without change obtained from the DSM differentiation method. Following the training process, changes were predicted using the trained network. Much better results were obtained from the second mode in which the difference between DSMs were used.
Bahram Choubin; karim solaimani; Mahmoud Habibnejad Roshan; Arash Malekian
Abstract
Extended abstract
Introduction
Management of watersheds requires understanding of watershed conditions both in gauged and ungaugedbasins. The classification of watersheds by similarcharacteristics for the implementation of coordinated watershed operations and flood control as well as giving priority ...
Read More
Extended abstract
Introduction
Management of watersheds requires understanding of watershed conditions both in gauged and ungaugedbasins. The classification of watersheds by similarcharacteristics for the implementation of coordinated watershed operations and flood control as well as giving priority to sub-basinsis of great importance. The need for a classification framework in hydrology is not an entirely new subject. In fact, this subject has long been discussed and several studies have also attempted to advance this idea. So far, no acceptedcomprehensive protocol has been presented for the classification of watersheds,and questions can be raised regarding why this has not happened. More efforts must be made in order to develop such a classification.Previous studies have used hard clustering methods more, for the classification of watersheds but, the present study used fuzzy approach as asoft method. In general, the purpose of this research is to focus on the characteristics of the watersheds including morphological characteristics, soil and land use for the identification of similar watersheds. These parameters can facilitate the watershed classification scheme and our understanding ofthe watershed conditions.
Materials & Methods
The dataset for this study includes is base maps (sub-watersheds boundary, streams and rivers, digital elevation model (DEM), soil and landuse which have been collected from Iran Water Resources Management Company. To classify the Karkheh watershed, 35 spatio-physical indices including topographic, morphological, landuse characteristics and soil parameters were considered. These indices have been calculated for each watershed. The dimension reduction of the variables was an important part, because 35 indices were quite large for the classification of 38 watersheds. Therefore, factor analysis for each group of indices wasusedseparately to reduce the number of variables.
After reducing the variables and selecting the final indices, the fuzzy clustering approach was conducted to classify the watersheds into homogenous groups. The number of optimal clusterswas determined through trial and error and the functions of partition coefficient and partition entropy evaluation.
Results & Discussion
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test statistics for each group of the morphological, landuse and soil indices were 0.71, 0.69 and 0.76 respectively, indicating that the data was suitable for factor analysis. Factor analysis was conducted using Principle Component Analysis (PCA) method and the results revealed that among 35 spatio-physical indices, 9 indices (4 morphological indices, 3 land use indices and 2 soil parameters) had a higher load factor than other indices. Therefore, indices of the watershed surface, basin elongation, average length of drainage network and total topographic indexamong the morphological indices;percentage indices of rangelands, agricultural lands and wastelandsamong the land use indices; and indices of water holding capacity in the soil layer and saturated hydraulic conductivity among the soil parameters were selected as the ultimate criteria for grouping the watersheds.
Theselectedfactors were normalized between zero and one before the classification. Then, sub-watersheds were classified using fuzzy C-mean (FCM) approach. The trial and error method was used to find thenumber of optimum clusters. The maximum amount of evaluation function of partition coefficient equal to 0.76 and the minimum amount of partition entropy function equal to 0.49 occurred in three clusterstherefore,the number of optimum clusters equal to 3 clusters was determined through trial and error.The results of classification indicated that the triple groups included the sub-watersheds of the northeastern regions and parts of central regions of the Karkheh watershed (group 1), the northwestern- southeasternalong with the southern regions of Karkheh watershed (group 2) and the central regions and parts of southwestern regions of Karkheh watershed (group 3).
Conclusion
Watershed classification with similar characteristics can be used as a method for watershed management, flood control and giving the priority to critical sub-basins. However, watershed classification is only completedwhenit is understood why some catchments belong to certain groups of hydrological behavior, so as to be possible to classify gauged and ungaugedwatersheds through it.
Finally, it is important to remember that classification of watersheds is not the “be-all and end-all” of research on watersheds, but rather only a means towards achieving broader aims of planning and management of our ecosystems, environment, water resources, and other relevant earth systems and resources. However, watershed classification certainly allows us to study catchments more effectively and efficiently and develop more appropriate strategies in terms of simplification in models/model development, generalization in our modeling approach, and improvement in communication both within the hydrologic community and across disciplines, as much as possible.