Sara Haghbayan; Behnam Tashayo; Mehdi Momeni
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Today, one of the most complex issues in most countries is the high crime rate and the increase in social anomalies in them. One of these anomalies is residential burglary, which is one of the most widespread crimes in most countries of the world. Because spatial and ...
Read More
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Today, one of the most complex issues in most countries is the high crime rate and the increase in social anomalies in them. One of these anomalies is residential burglary, which is one of the most widespread crimes in most countries of the world. Because spatial and time play a very important and undeniable role in the formation of hot crime spots such as residential burglary therefore, by identifying the spatial and temporal of hot crime spots can be largely prevented. Previous studies have focused more on identifying and analyzing spatial crime hotspots and performing temporal analysis of crimes independently of spatial crime hotspots. However, in order to prevent the occurrence of these crimes in the future, a combination of time and spatial hot crime spots is needed to provide a more complete and accurate analysis. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic method for combining spatial and temporal information of residential burglary. The proposed method is based on spatial analysis and allows investigating the temporal distribution of events in hot crime spots. For this purpose, GIS capabilities have been used to perform statistical and graphical tests to identify and display crime hotspots. The results showed that hotspots follow a spatially clustered and temporally focused pattern. The research findings showed that the highest frequency of burglary is in hot spot No.4 in 2016 August, on Wednesday at 8 am, and the lowest frequency of burglary is in hot spot No.1 in 2018 January, on Sunday at 4 am.
Materials & Methods
The statistical tests used in this study include mean center, standard deviation ellipse test for clustering. The first step in identifying crime hotspots is to use the tests for clustering. For this purpose, in this study, the method of the average nearest neighbor is used. The results of residential burglary test for clustering showed that this crime is a cluster pattern in the study area. After proving to be clustered, graphical methods including point map display and kernel density have been used to display the hot crime spots. The results of the kernel density test cause to the identification and display of four spatial the hot crime spots in the study area.
The data used in this research include information on the time, place and type of crimes in the years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018. The total number of crimes is 319073, of which 5573 were related to residential burglary, which was used as a statistical population in this study.
Results & Discussion
Statistical analysis was performed over a period of four years, which is equivalent to 48 months and 35064 around the clock for each hot crime spot. The results show that the highest incidence of crime in hot spot No.4 is equivalent to 1172 cases of residential burglary, which of all these four hot spot has a smaller area equivalent to 1117 hectares. Temporal analyzes of hot crime spots were performed annually, monthly, weekly and hourly. The results of the annual analysis of all four hot spots show that the highest rate of residential burglary is in 2016 and the lowest rate is in 2018.
The findings of this study show that the combination of spatial and temporal of hot crime spots analysis lump-sum by temporal analysis regardless of the spatial hot spots in monthly, daily and hourly intervals is significantly different. The combination of spatial and temporal of hot crime spots in the monthly interval shows that the maximum and minimum rates of residential burglary per month are different in these four hot spots. The highest number of residential burglary respectively occurred in hot spot No. 1 in October, in hot spot No. 2 in August, in hot spot No. 3 in June and in hot spot No. 4 in August. However, the results of the statistical analysis of time without considering the spatial hot crime spots show that August is the highest and April is the lowest. Daily statistical analysis shows that the highest number of residential burglary occurs in hot spot No. 1 and hot spot No. 3 on Friday, while in hot spot No. 2 it is Thursday and in hot spot No. 4 it is Wednesday. This analysis is different with a general daily analysis that shows Friday as the highest number of occurrences. Hourly analysis also shows that the peak of residential burglary in all four centers is at different hours; Thus, the peak of residential burglary areas in the study area is in the hot spot No. 1 hour 22, in the hot spot No. 2 hours 17, in hot spot No. 3 hours 12, in the hot spot No. 4 hours 8. However, statistical analysis of the time without considering the spatial hot spot shows the peak of residential burglary at 12 noon.
Conclusion
In this study, a new framework for the simultaneously displaying the pattern of crimes in two dimensions of spatial and time was presented, which can be used to identify the pattern of distribution of spatial and temporal of hot crime spots. The results of kernel density estimation analysis are four spatial-temporal crime hotspots where the spatial hotspot distribution pattern is clustered and the temporal of hot crime spots distribution pattern is focused. The results show that 78% of burglaries occur in these four crime hotspot, which cover only 25% of the total area of the study area. Therefore, by identifying the spatial and temporal of hot spots, crime can be largely prevented. This method is used to identify and display any type of crime in each study area and allows the identification and display of the combination of spatial and temporal hot crime spots.
Mehdi Bazargan; Mohammad Ajza Shokouhi
Abstract
Introduction Nowadays, theft -especially residential burglary-is considered as one of the most common and frequent crimes in many countries of the world, including Iran. As such, it has become a pervasive and serious problem with various social, economic, and security-related aspects. Investigating ...
Read More
Introduction Nowadays, theft -especially residential burglary-is considered as one of the most common and frequent crimes in many countries of the world, including Iran. As such, it has become a pervasive and serious problem with various social, economic, and security-related aspects. Investigating geographical dimensions of this crime facilitates the process of exploring this phenomenon. Space and its special features play an important and undeniable role in crime commitment, because space has always been considered as one of the most important factors in commitment of financial crimes such as residential burglary. Spatial analysis and geographical investigation of crimes seek to provide a spatial presentation of criminal actions, crime dispersion, and crime hotspots. This type of crime analysis basically aims to provide a model for decreasing crime commitment in urban spaces. Accordingly, the present research seeks tomodel spatial diffusion of residential burglary crimes in MashhadusingHogstrand’s spatial diffusion theory. Materials and methods The present study is performed based on descriptive-analytic and qualitative methods. The research sample includes cases of residential burglary committed in Mashhad in the 2011-2017period. Data analysis was performed using ArcGIS software. Case study area includes Mashhad, with an area of about 35187 hectares, a population of more than 3057679, and a population density of 87 people per hectare. Results and discussion Police reports in Mashhad suggest that the highest crime rates belong to the 2nd and 3thdistricts, and the lowest rates belong toSamen (around Razavi Shrine), the 12th, and 8thdistricts. 70% of crimes in Mashhad are committed in informal settlements including the 2nd, 3th, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 10thdistricts. However, only 10.6% of the city area and 29.3% of its population belong to these districts. Furthermore, the highest crime rates have been reported in 2017. In 2011, only two major crime hotspots were observed in Mashahd (in the 2nd and 3thdistricts). Results suggest that crimes have spread from one place to anotherin Mashhad, which indicates a close relationship between crime and distance factor. In other words, proximity to a crime hotspothas resulted in rapid spread of crimes, and due to the short distance, nearby places have been affected more quickly. Informal settlements of Mashhad are located in eastern, northern, and northeastern districts,which contain 99% of crime hotspots. This indicates that spatial autocorrelation of crimes in informal settlements of Mashhad is relatively high, which has led to formation of crime hotspots in these districts. However, moving from marginalized areas towards southern districts of Mashhad (more prosperous regions), spatial correlation of crimes decreases, and lead to formation of 99% of cold spots. Conclusion The present research has investigated the spatial diffusion pattern of crimes in Mashhad in 2011-2017period.To reach this end, crime hotspots were investigated by quantitative methods such as Kernel density, Moran coefficient, and crime hotspot analysis. Results suggest that the highest crime rates are reported in the 2nd and 3thdistricts, while the lowest rates are reported in Samen (around Razavi Shrine), the 12th, and 8th regions. In fact, 70% of crimes in Mashhad are committed in informal settlements including the 2nd, 3th, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 10thdistricts. Moreover, statistics indicate that for every100000 people,anaverage of 75/2 cases of crimes have been reported in the 2011-2017period.Results of Moran coefficient for spatial diffusion of crimes indicated the presence of a cluster distribution of crimes in Mashhad. Meanwhile, spatial diffusion pattern of crimes in Mashhad suggests that the first crime hotspots were formed in northern, eastern, and northeastern districtsof Mashhad, and crimes have spread from these to other districts (more central and prosperous regions such as the 8th and 9thdistricts). In fact, investigations suggest that crimes are spreading from informal settlements to other regionsof Mashhad, and acompatible spatial diffusion pattern of crimes exists in this city.
