فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

بهبود طبقه بندی منطقه شهری با استفاده از تلفیق تصاویر اپتیک چندباندی و لایدار با قدرت تفکیک مکانی بالا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
علیرضا ارفته 1
طاهر رضا محمد 1
علی حسینقلی زاده 2
احسان حقوقی فرد 3
1 کارشناس ارشد سنجش از دور، دانشکده مهندسی نقشه برداری و اطلاعات مکانی، پردیس دانشکده های فنی، دانشگاه تهران
2 کارشناس ارشد سنجش از دور و سیستم اطلاعات مکانی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران
3 دانشجوی کارشناس ارشد مدیریت شهری، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شیراز
10.22131/sepehr.2019.35638
چکیده
امروزه با گسترش مناطق شهری تولید اطلاعات دقیق و به روز از جمله اطلاعات اساسی، به منظور مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی شهرها است. گسترش روز افزون تکنولوژی سنجش از دور امکان استخراج اطلاعات متنوع از پوشش‌های شهری را فراهم آورده که موجب جلب توجه محقق‌های فراوانی به این موضوع شده است. وجود عوارض متنوع و نیز کاربری‌های مختلف اطلاعات مکانی مناطق شهری، تلفیق منابع داده مختلف به منظور شناسایی عوارض را به امری کاربردی مبدل کرده است. هدف این تحقیق تلفیق ویژگی‌های بهینه استخراج شده از داده‌های اپتیک و لایدار به منظور شناسایی عوارض شهری در منطقه مورد مطالعه می‌باشد. در این راستا ویژگی‌های مختلفی از هر یک از این داده‌ها استخراج شده است. از جمله این ویژگی‌ها می‌توان به ویژگی‌های رنگی، شاخص گیاهی و بافت از تصویر اپتیک و ویژگی‌های نرمی، مدل ارتفاعی رقومی نرمال و زبری از تصویر لیدار اشاره نمود. سپس به منظور انتخاب ویژگی‌های بهینه از الگوریتم ژنتیک استفاده شده است. در انتها با استفاده از روش طبقه‌بندی کننده ماشین‌بردار پشتیبان به شناسایی عوارض مورد نظر پرداخته شده است. دقت طبقه‌بندی کننده الگوریتم ماشین بردار پشتیبان در منطقه مورد مطالعه با استفاده از ویژگی‌های بهینه و داده‌های اولیه 734/88 محاسبه شده که نسبت به طبقه‌بندی داده اولیه اپتیک چندباندی دارای بهبود 438/25 درصدی و نسبت به طبقه‌بندی داده اولیه لایدار دارای بهبود 236/18 درصدی است. نتایج بررسی نشان دهنده افزایش دقت طبقه‌بندی با استفاده از ویژگی‌های بهینه در کنار باندهای اولیه است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
مناطق شهری
تصاویر اپتیک و لایدار
تلفیق در سطح ویژگی
الگوریتم ژنتیک
ماشین بردار پشتیبان

عنوان مقاله English

Improving the classification of urban areas with the Fusion of multispectral optical and high spatial resolution LiDAR images

نویسندگان English

Alireza Arofteh 1
Taher Reza Mohammed 1
Ali Hossingholizade 2
Ehsan Hoghoghi fard 3
1 M.Sc. of Surveying and geospatial engineering, College of Engineering of University of Tehran
2 Department of Geographic Sciences, Kharazmi University
3 Department of urban management, Islamic Azad University of Shiraz
چکیده English

Increasing development of urban areas, the need for various information from the urban environment, and also technological advancements have increased the importance of automatic and semi-automatic classification and identification of this type of land cover. The diversity of remote sensing data have created a wide scope for urban feature detection. Moreover, by launching satellite sensors with a spatial resolving power of less than 1 meter, a dramatic revolution has occurred in the tendency of remote sensing researchers toward classification of urban features. The existence of various features and different applications of spatial information in urban areas have made it possible to integrate various data sources with the aim of identifying different urban features. The present study seeks to integrate optimal properties extracted from optical and LiDAR data in order to identify urban features in the study area. In this regard, colored features, normal difference vegetative index (NDVI), first-order statistical texture in three windows of 5×5, 7×7 and 9×9, second-order statistical texture in three windows of 7×7, 11×11 and 15×15 extracted from the multispectral optical data were calculated along with features of normalized difference index (NDI), slope, slope direction, profile curve, surface curve, roughness, variance, laplacian, smoothness and normalized digital surface model (nDSM) extracted from the LiDAR data. Since increased amount of information has made the process of identifying features in the region time-consuming, the present study applies intelligent genetic algorithm to select optimal features from the calculated features. A total number of 361 features were produced from this data, including 9 colored features, a vegetation index, 144 first-order statistical texture, and 192 second-order statistical texture from multispectral optical data and 14 features from LiDAR data. Then, 17 features including seven features of the LiDAR data and 10 features of the multispectral optical data were determined using genetic algorithm as the optimal features for more appropriate identification of urban features. Finally, support vector machine (SVM) classification method was used to identify the desired features. Results indicate that compared to LiDAR data, multispectral optical data have a better performance in classifying vegetation features, while LiDAR data have been more suitable for the classification of road and building features. In other words, multispectral optical data work appropriately in identifying features with different radiometric information, while classification of features with similar radiometric information, such as roads and buildings is problematic. Thus, LiDAR elevation data help in identification of these features. Additionally, using optimal features along with the primary bands have increased the accuracy of urban features classification. Using optimal features and initial data, the accuracy of support vector machine algorithm classifier in the study area is calculated to be 88.734, which shows 25.438% improvement compared to the initial multispectral optical data classification, and 18. 236% improvement compared to the initial LiDAR data classification.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Urban area
Optical and LiDAR images
Feature level fusion
Genetic algorithm
Support vector machine
1- Alonso, M. C., & Malpica, J. A. (2008, December). Classification of multispectral high-resolution satellite imagery using LIDAR elevation data. In International Symposium on Visual Computing (pp. 85-94). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.‏
-2 Arefi, H., & Hahn, M. (2005). A morphological reconstruction algorithm for separating off-terrain points from terrain points in laser scanning data. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 36(3/W19), 120-125.‏
-3 Axelsson, P. (1999). Processing of laser scanner data—algorithms and applications. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54(2), 138-147.‏
-4 Berger, C., Voltersen, M., Eckardt, R., Eberle, J., Heyer, T., Salepci, N., & Bamler, R. (2013). Multi-modal and multi-temporal data fusion: Outcome of the 2012 GRSS data fusion contest. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 6(3), 1324-1340.‏
-5  Bigdeli, B., & Pahlavani, P. (2016). High resolution multisensor fusion of SAR, optical and LiDAR data based on crisp vs. fuzzy and feature vs. decision ensemble systems. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 52, 126-136.‏
-6 Boser, B. E., Guyon, I. M., & Vapnik, V. N. (1992, July). A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory (pp. 144-152). ACM.‏
7- Brennan, R., & Webster, T. L. (2006). Object-oriented land cover classification of lidar-derived surfaces. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(2), 162-172.‏
 8- Camps-Valls, G., Gómez-Chova, L., Calpe-Maravilla, J., Martín-Guerrero, J. D., Soria-Olivas, E., Alonso-Chordá, L., & Moreno, J. (2004). Robust support vector method for hyperspectral data classification and knowledge discovery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote sensing, 42(7), 1530-1542.‏
-9 Camps-Valls, G., & Bruzzone, L. (2005). Kernel-based methods for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(6), 1351-1362.‏
-10 Cao, Y., Zhao, H., Li, N., & Wei, H. (2011, January). Land-cover classification by airborne LIDAR data fused with aerial optical images. In Multi-Platform/Multi-Sensor Remote Sensing and Mapping (M2RSM), 2011 International Workshop on (pp. 1-6). IEEE.‏
-11 Carleer, A., & Wolff, E. (2006). Region-based classification potential for land-cover classification with very high spatial resolution satellite data.‏
12-  Clode, S., Kootsookos, P. J., & Rottensteiner, F. (2004). The automatic extraction of roads from LIDAR data. In The International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing’s Twentieth Annual Congress (Vol. 35, pp. 231-236). ISPRS.‏
13- Cobby, D. M., Mason, D. C., Horritt, M. S., & Bates, P. D. (2003). Two dimensional hydraulic flood modelling using a finite element mesh decomposed according to vegetation and topographic features derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry. Hydrological processes, 17(10), 1979-2000.‏
14- Flood, M. (2001). LiDAR activities and research priorities in the commercial sector. International Archives of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 34(3/W4), 3-8.‏
-15 Gerke, M., & Xiao, J. (2014). Fusion of airborne laserscanning point clouds and images for supervised and unsupervised scene classification. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 87, 78-92.‏
-16 Gonzalez, R. C., Masters, B. R., & Woods, R. (2009). Digital image processing. Journal of biomedical optics, 14(2), 029901.
17- Guan, X., Liao, S., Bai, J., Wang, F., Li, Z., Wen, Q., He, J., & Chen, T. (2017). Urban land-use classification by combining high-resolution optical and long-wave infrared images. Geo-spatial Information Science, 20(4), 299-308.‏
-18 Holland, J. H., & Miller, J. H. (1991). Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory. The American economic review, 81(2), 365-370.‏
19- Huang, B., Wang, J., Song, H., Fu, D., & Wong, K. (2013). Generating high spatiotemporal resolution land surface temperature for urban heat island monitoring. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 10(5), 1011-1015.‏
20- Koetz, B., Morsdorf, F., Curt, T., van der Linden, S., Borgniet, L., Odermatt, D., Alleaumeb, S., Lampinb, C., Jappiotb, M., & Allgöwer, B. (2007, March). Fusion of imaging spectrometer and LiDAR data using support vector machines for land cover classification in the context of forest fire management. In Proc. 10th International Symposium on Physical Measurements and Signatures in Remote Sensing (ISPMSRS’07), Davos, Switzerland (pp. 12-14).
21- Kraus, K., & Pfeifer, N. (1998). Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and remote Sensing, 53(4), 193-203.
22-   Li, H., Gu, H., Han, Y., & Yang, J. (2007, August). Fusion of high-resolution aerial imagery and lidar data for object-oriented urban land-cover classification based on SVM. In ISPRS Workshop on Updating Geo-spatial Databases with Imagery & The 5th ISPRS Workshop on DMGISs.‏
23-  Mason, D. C., Cobby, D. M., Horritt, M. S., & Bates, P. D. (2003). Floodplain friction parameterization in two dimensional river flood models using vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry. Hydrological processes, 17(9), 1711-1732.‏
24-  Ostir. K. (2008). Application of Laser Scanning Data for Land Cover Classification. MARS annual conference.
25-  Rouse Jr, J., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1974). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS.‏
26- Salehi, B. (2012). Urban Land Cover Classification and Moving Vehicle Extraction Using Very High Resolution Satellite Imagery (Doctoral dissertation, University of New Brunswick, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering).‏
-27 Sinagra, O., & Lim, S. (2014). Data Fusion and Supervised Classifications with Lidar Data and Multispectral Imagery. 14th SGEM GeoConference on Informatics, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing, 3(SGEM2014 Conference Proceedings, ISBN 978-619-7105-12-4/ISSN 1314-2704, June 19-25, 2014, Vol. 3), 129-136.‏
-28 Vosselman, G. (2000). Slope based filtering of laser altimetry data. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33(B3/2; PART 3), 935-942.‏
-29 Vozikis, G. (2004). Application of High Resolution Remote Sensing Data – Part III Urban data collection: an automated approach in remote sensing.
30- Warner, T. (2011). Kernel Based Texture in Remote Sensing Image Classification. Geography Compass, 5(10), 781-798.‏  
31- Zhang, J. (2010). Multi-source remote sensing data fusion: status and trends. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 1(1), 5-24.‏
 -32 Zhilin, Li., Zhu, C., & Gold, C. (2004). Digital terrain modeling: principles and methodology. CRC press