فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

تهیه نقشه سیلاب شهری با استفاده از تصاویر شدت SAR و همدوسی تداخل سنجی - مطالعه موردی: سیل گنبد کاووس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری دانشکده مهندسی نقشه برداری و اطلاعات مکانی، دانشکدگان فنی، دانشگاه تهران
2 استادیار دانشکده مهندسی نقشه برداری و اطلاعات مکانی، دانشکدگان فنی، دانشگاه تهران
3 عضو هیئت علمی, گروه مهندسی عمران, دانشگاه فنی و حرفه ای، تهران، ایران
چکیده
سیل یکی از مخاطرات طبیعی است که می­ تواند به شدت بر زندگی انسان تأثیر بگذارد، به گونه­ ای که واکنش اضطراری به آن نیاز به ارزیابی دقیق منطقه آسیب دیده پس از حادثه دارد. مشاهدات رادار با روزنه مجازی (SAR) بطور گسترده در تهیه نقشه و نظارت بر سیل استفاده می­ شود. با این حال، خدمات عملیاتی فعلی عمدتاً معطوف به سیل در مناطق روستایی است و مناطق سیل زده شهری، کمتر مورد توجه قرار می­ گیرند. در عمل، نقشه ­برداری از سیلاب­ های شهری به دلیل مکانیسم­ های پیچیده برگشت در محیط ­های شهری، چالش برانگیز است و علاوه بر شدت SAR، اطلاعات دیگری نیز لازم است. در این مقاله یک روش طبقه ­بندی برای تشخیص سیل در مناطق شهری با تلفیق استفاده از شدت SAR و همدوسی تداخل­ سنجی تحت چارچوب شبکه عصبی کانولوشن CNN معرفی می ­شود، تا اطلاعات سیل از مناظر مختلف را استخراج نماید. به منظور تمایز تغییرات حاصل از سیلاب از دیگر تغییرات، از سه سری زمانی همدوسی حاصل از تصاویر(قبل ـ قبل، قبل ـ بعد و بعد ـ بعد) استفاده شده است. این روش در رویداد سیل 25 اسفند 1397 گنبد کاووس  با داده­ های Sentinel-1 آزمایش می­ شود. نقشه­ های سیلاب حاصل از تلفیق شدت و همدوسی و شدت به تنهایی در مقایسه با داده ­های کنترل زمینی در مناطق شهری و داده­ های حاصل از آستانه­ گذاری تصاویر سنتینل-1 نشان می­ دهد که دقت کلی 93.8٪ و ضریب کاپا 0.81 برای ترکیب شدت و همدوسی و نیز دقت کلی 90.6٪ و ضریب کاپا 0.72 برای ترکیب شدت به تنهایی و دقت کلی 86.8٪ و ضریب کاپا 0.56 برای ترکیب همدوسی به تنهایی وجود دارد. آزمایش ها نشان می ­دهند که همدوسی علاوه بر شدت در تهیه نقشه از سیلاب شهری، اطلاعات ارزشمندی را فراهم می­ کند و روش پیشنهادی می­ تواند ابزاری مفید برای تهیه نقشه از سیلاب شهری باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Urban Flood Mapping using SAR Intensity Images and Coherence Interference - Case Study: Flood Event of Gonbad-e-Kavus

نویسندگان English

Somayeh Aslani Katouli 1
Reza Shah-Hosseini 2
Hamid Bagheri 3
1 Ph.D Student in school of surveying and geospatial engineering, College of engineering, University of Tehran
2 Assistant professor in School of surveying and geospatial engineering, College of engineering, University of Tehran
3 Department of civil engineering, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Introduction
A flood is a widespread and dramatic natural disaster that affects the life, infrastructure, economy, and local ecosystems of the world. In this paper, a method for flood detection in urban (and suburban) environments using the intensity and coherence of SAR based on a convolutional neural network is introduced, and from the time series of SAR intensity and coherence to draw flood without obstruction (e.g. Flooded bare soils and short vegetation) are used. Non-cohesive areas blocked by floods (e.g., flooded vegetation) and cohesive areas with flood-blocked areas (e.g., frequently constructed flooded areas) are distinguished.
This method is flexible according to the time period of the data sequences (at least one pair of pre-event and event intensities and one pair of pre-event and in-event coherence are required). The increasing number of SAR missions in orbit that have a fixed viewing scenario with a short retry time increases the chances of seeing a flood event, while also having a good pre-event scene achieved by the same sensor. This makes this method desirable for operational emergency responses.
Materials & Methods
CNN algorithm is a multilayer perceptron that is designed to identify two-dimensional information of images and includes: input layer, convolution layer, sample layer, and output layer. The CNN algorithm has two main processes: collection and sampling.
The convolution process involves the use of a trainable Fx filter, deconvolution of the input image (the first step of image input, input after image convolution, is the feature of each layer called Feature Map), then by adding bx can be hand convolution of the CX layer Found. Sampling process: n pixels are collected from each neighborhood to form a pixel, then weighted with a scalar weight of Wx + 1 and a bx + 1 bias is added, then a map of The Narrow n times feature map properties are generated.
Three images of Sentinel-1A VV polarization, wide width interference (IW), and mode (SLC) data were used in this study. Intensity images were pre-processed with radiometric calibration, noise reduced with a spell-filter (window size 5.5 pixels), and converted from linear units to decibels. Coherent images were obtained with a pair of consecutive images with a window of 7.28 (range _ azimuth). Validation data set due to the lack of other data in two separate sections of ground data in the urban area of GonbadKavous that have been collected to identify homes damaged by floods and terrestrial reality data from gamma image thresholds for output validation were extracted.
Results & Discussion
In this section, the results of the study are qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed. Because the simultaneous display of SAR data over time in the form of RGB compounds is widely used in the qualitative interpretation of land cover and surface dynamics, RGB compounds are used to provide evidence of flood magnitude in terms of intensity and coherence. For both cases, the results of combining intensity and coherence and intensity alone and coherence alone are quantitatively analyzed. Overall accuracy (OA), kappa correlation coefficient, false-positive rate (FPR), precision (e.g., correctly predicted positive patterns out of the total predicted patterns in a positive class), recall (e.g., a fraction of properly classified positive patterns), and an F1 score (ie the harmonic mean between precision and recall). Flood reference and ground data are mentioned and reported based on the reference.
Conclusion
In this paper, a method for mapping floods in urban environments based on SAR intensity and interferometry coherence was introduced. A combination of intensity and coherence extracts flood information in different types of land cover and outlet. This method was tested on the KavousGonbad flood incident obtained by various SAR sensors and the flood maps were confirmed by the flood reference resulting from thresholding and ground harvesting and satisfactory results were shown in this case study. The findings of this experiment show that the shared use of SAR intensity and coherence provides more reliable information than the use of SAR intensity and coherence alone in urban areas with different landscapes. In particular, flood detection in less cohesive / non-cohesive areas (e.g., bare soils, vegetation, vegetated areas) relies heavily on multi-temporality, while multi-temporal coherence provides more comprehensive flood information in areas Create coherence (e.g., mostly built-up areas). However, some flood-specific situations, such as flooded parking lots and flooded dense building blocks, are still challenging in terms of intensity and coherence. Also, since the proposed method is sensor and scene independent, with very frequent and regular observations of SAR missions such as Sentinel-1 and RADARSAT (RCM), there are opportunities to map global floods on a global scale, especially in small countries. Provides income.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Urban Flood Mapping
SAR Multi-Time Images
InSAR Coherence
Convolution Neural Network
1- Cao, W., Twele, A., Plank, S., & Martinis, S. (2018). A three-class change detection methodology for SAR-data based on hypothesis testing and Markov Random field modelling. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39(2), 488–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1384590
2- Cerbaro, M., Morse, S., Murphy, R., Lynch, J., & Griffiths, G. (2020). Information from earth observation for the management of sustainable land use and land cover in Brazil: an analysis of user needs. Sustainability, 12(2), 489
3- Chini, M., Hostache, R., Giustarini, L., & Matgen, P. (2017). A Hierarchical Split-Based Approach for Parametric Thresholding of SAR Images: Flood Inundation as a Test Case. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55(12), 6975–6988. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2737664
4- Chini, M., Pelich, R., Pulvirenti, L., Pierdicca, N., Hostache, R., & Matgen, P. (2019). Sentinel-1 InSAR Coherence to Detect Floodwater in Urban Areas: Houston and Hurricane Harvey as A Test Case. Remote Sensing, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11020107
5- Chini, M., Pulvirenti, L., & Pierdicca, N. (2012). Analysis and Interpretation of the COSMO-SkyMed Observations of the 2011 Japan Tsunami. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters - IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE SENS LETT, 9, 467–471. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2011.2182495
6- D’Addabbo, A., Refice, A., Pasquariello, G., Lovergine, F. P., Capolongo, D., & Manfreda, S. (2016). A Bayesian Network for Flood Detection Combining SAR Imagery and Ancillary Data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(6), 3612–3625. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2520487
7- Dong, Y., Forster, B., & Ticehurst, C. (1997). Radar backscatter analysis for urban environments. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18(6), 1351–1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311697218467
8- F.Covello, Battazza, F., Coletta, A., Lopinto, E., Fiorentino, C., Pietranera, L., Valentini, G., & Zoffoli, S. (2010). COSMO-SkyMed an existing opportunity for observing the Earth. Journal of Geodynamics, 49, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2010.01.001
9- Ferro, A., Brunner, D., Bruzzone, L., & Lemoine, G. (2011). On the Relationship Between Double Bounce and the Orientation of Buildings in VHR SAR Images. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 8(4), 612–616. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2010.2097580
10- Franceschetti, G., Iodice, A., & Riccio, D. (2002). A canonical problem in electromagnetic backscattering from buildings. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(8), 1787–1801. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.802459
11- Giustarini, L., Hostache, R., Matgen, P., Schumann, G., Bates, P., & Mason, D. (2013). A Change Detection Approach to Flood Mapping in Urban Areas Using TerraSAR-X. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51, 2417–2430. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2210901
12- Goodman, J. (1963). Statistical Properties of Laser Speckle Patterns. Laser Speckle and Related Phenomena, 9, 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0111436
13- Iervolino, P., Guida, R., Iodice, A., & Riccio, D. (2015). Flooding Water Depth Estimation With High-Resolution SAR. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2014.2358501
14- Insom, P., Cao, C., Boonsrimuang, P., Liu, D., Saokarn, A., Yomwan, P., & Xu, Y. (2015). A Support Vector Machine-Based Particle Filter Method for Improved Flooding Classification. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 12(9), 1943–1947. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2015.2439575
15- Kankaku, Y., Suzuki, S., & Osawa, Y. (2013). ALOS-2 mission and development status. 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS, 2396–2399. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS. 2013.6723302
16- Kazemi, H., & Akinci, H. (2018). A land use suitability model for rainfed farming by Multi-criteria Decision-making Analysis (MCDA) and Geographic Information System (GIS). Ecological Engineering, 116, 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.021
17- Kh.Soltanian, F., Abbasi, M., & riyahi bakhtyari,  hamid reza. (2019). FLOOD MONITORING USING NDWI AND MNDWI SPECTRAL INDICES: A CASE STUDY OF AGHQALA FLOOD-2019, GOLESTAN PROVINCE, IRAN. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-4/W18, 605–607. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-605-2019
18- Li, Y., Martinis, S., Plank, S., & Ludwig, R. (2018). An automatic change detection approach for rapid flood mapping in Sentinel-1 SAR data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 73, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2018.05.023
19- Li, Y., Martinis, S., & Wieland, M. (2019). Urban flood mapping with an active self-learning convolutional neural network based on TerraSAR-X intensity and interferometric coherence. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 152, 178–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.014
20- Lu, C.-H., Ni, C.-F., Chang, C.-P., Yen, J.-Y., & Chuang, R. Y. (2018). Coherence Difference Analysis of Sentinel-1 SAR Interferogram to Identify Earthquake-Induced Disasters in Urban Areas. Remote Sensing, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10081318
21- Martinis, S., Twele, A., & Voigt, S. (2011). Unsupervised Extraction of Flood-Induced Backscatter Changes in SAR Data Using Markov Image Modeling on Irregular Graphs. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49(1), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2010.2052816
22- Mason, D. C., Davenport, I. J., Neal, J. C., Schumann, G. J.-., & Bates, P. D. (2012). Near Real-Time Flood Detection in Urban and Rural Areas Using High-Resolution Synthetic Aperture Radar Images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(8), 3041–3052. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2178030
23- Mason, D. C., Giustarini, L., Garcia-Pintado, J., & Cloke, H. L. (2014). Detection of flooded urban areas in high resolution Synthetic Aperture Radar images using double scattering. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 28, 150–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.12.002
24- Mason, D. C., Speck, R., Devereux, B., Schumann, G. J.-., Neal, J. C., & Bates, P. D. (2010). Flood Detection in Urban Areas Using TerraSAR-X. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(2), 882–894. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2009.2029236
25- Matgen, P., Hostache, R., Schumann, G., Pfister, L., Hoffmann, L., & Savenije, H. H. G. (2011). Towards an automated SAR-based flood monitoring system: Lessons learned from two case studies. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 36(7), 241–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.12.009
26- Morena, L. C., James, K., & Beck, J. (2004). An introduction to the RADARSAT-2 mission. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 30, 221–234.
27- N, W. S., Anders, L., Fang, Z., & Katja, F. (2022). Adaptation required to preserve future high-end river flood risk at present levels. Science Advances, 4(1), eaao1914. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao1914
28- Pulvirenti, L., Chini, M., Pierdicca, N., & Boni, G. (2016). Use of SAR Data for Detecting Floodwater in Urban and Agricultural Areas: The Role of the Interferometric Coherence. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(3), 1532–1544. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2015.2482001
29- Pulvirenti, L., Chini, M., Pierdicca, N., Guerriero, L., & Ferrazzoli, P. (2011). Flood monitoring using multi-temporal COSMO-SkyMed data: Image segmentation and signature interpretation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115, 990–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.002
30- Schumann, G. J.-P., & Moller, D. K. (2015). Microwave remote sensing of flood inundation. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 83–84, 84–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.05.002
31- Sharifi, A. (2018). Estimation of biophysical parameters in wheat crops in Golestan province using ultra-high resolution images. Remote Sensing Letters, 9(6), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2018.1452058
32-  Sheikh, V., Kornejady, A., & Ownegh, M. (2019). Application of the coupled TOPSIS–Mahalanobis distance for multi-hazard-based management of the target districts of the Golestan Province, Iran. Natural Hazards, 96(3), 1335–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03617-0
33- Shen, X., Wang, D., Mao, K., Anagnostou, E., & Hong, Y. (2019). Inundation Extent Mapping by Synthetic Aperture Radar: A Review, Remote Sens., 11, 879.
34-Tanguy, M., Chokmani, K., Bernier, M., Poulin, J., & Raymond, S. (2017). River flood mapping in urban areas combining Radarsat-2 data and flood return period data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 198, 442–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.042
35- Thiele, A., Cadario, E., Schulz, K., Thonnessen, U., & Soergel, U. (2007). Building Recognition From Multi-Aspect High-Resolution InSAR Data in Urban Areas. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(11), 3583–3593. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.898440
36- Tong, X., Luo, X., Liu, S., Xie, H., Chao, W.-Y., Liu, S., Liu, S., Makhinov, A. N., Makhinova, A. F., & Jiang, Y. (2018). An approach for flood monitoring by the combined use of Landsat 8 optical imagery and COSMO-SkyMed radar imagery. Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 136, 144–153.
37- Torres, R., Snoeij, P., Geudtner, D., Bibby, D., Davidson, M., Attema, E., Potin, P., Rommen, B., Floury, N., Brown, M., Traver, I. N., Deghaye, P., Duesmann, B., Rosich, B., Miranda, N., Bruno, C., L’Abbate, M., Croci, R., Pietropaolo, A., … Rostan, F. (2012). GMES Sentinel-1 mission. Remote Sensing of Environment, 120, 9–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.028
38- Twele, A., Cao, W., Plank, S., & Martinis, S. (2016). Sentinel-1-based flood mapping: a fully automated processing chain. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 37(13), 2990–3004. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1192304
39- Valuations, E. (2015).  A Review on evaluation metrics for dataclassification evaluation.
40- Watanabe, M., Thapa, R. B., Ohsumi, T., Fujiwara, H., Yonezawa, C., Tomii, N., & Suzuki, S. (2016). Detection of damaged urban areas using interferometric SAR coherence change with PALSAR-2. Earth, Planets and Space, 68(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0513-2
41- Wegner, J. D., Hänsch, R., Thiele, A., & Soergel, U. (2011). Building Detection From One Orthophoto and High-Resolution InSAR Data Using Conditional Random Fields. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 4(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2010.2053521
42- Werninghaus, R., & Buckreuss, S. (2010). The TerraSAR-X Mission and System Design. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(2), 606–614. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2009.2031062
43- Willner, S. N., Otto, C., & Levermann, A. (2018). Global economic response to river floods. Nature Climate Change, 8(7), 594–598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0173-2
44- Zebker, H. A., & Villasenor, J. (1992). Decorrelation in interferometric radar echoes. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 30(5), 950–959. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.175330.