فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

ارزیابی خطرپذیری مسیر خطوط لوله نفت و گاز بر محیط زیست با استفاده از روش سیستم استنتاج فازی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیارگروه سنجش از دور و سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری سنجش از دور و سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
3 دانش آموخته دکتری سنجش از دور و سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی، دانشکده علوم زمین، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
چکیده
امروزه خطوط لوله به‌طور گسترده‌ای برای انتقال نفت و گاز در فواصل طولانی مورداستفاده قرار می گیرند؛ بنابراین ارزیابی خطرپذیری آن‌ها می‌تواند به شناسایی خطرات مرتبط و انجام اقدامات لازم برای حذف یا کاهش پیامد حاصل از آن کمک کند. در تحقیق حاضر، از یک سیستم استنتاج فازی (FIS) برای ارزیابی خطرپذیری مسیر خطوط لوله استفاده‌شده است. به این منظور در ابتدا لایه‌های مکانی موردنیاز با استفاده از تصاویر ماهواره‌ای و داده‌های موجود تهیه شد. در گام بعدی نیز پایگاه قوانین سیستم استنتاج فازی بر اساس دانش کارشناسی تهیه شد. در ادامه نقشه‌ی خطرپذیری خطوط لوله نفت و گاز یک‌بار از منظر فنی و یک بار از منظر عوامل محیطی پهنه‌بندی شده و سپس نقشه‌های به‌دست‌آمده به‌منظور تهیه نقشه پهنه‌بندی خطرپذیری نهایی مسیر خطوط لوله باهم تلفیق شدند. نتایج نشان داد که مدل پیشنهادی می‌تواند رویکرد جدید و قابل‌اطمینانی را ازنظر ارزیابی خطرپذیری مسیر خطوط لوله نفت و گاز بر محیط طبیعی پیرامون از منطقه ارائه دهد. تلفیق نقشه خطرپذیری نهایی و مسیر خطوط لوله نفت و گاز موجود در منطقه نفتی مارون نشان داد که 2.8 درصد از کل مسیر خط لوله که معادل 7 کیلومتر طول خطوط لوله است در صورت وقوع حوادث ناشی از خط لوله (مانند: انفجار، آتش‌سوزی، نشت گاز و میعانات نفتی و غیره) می‌تواند خطرپذیرتر از سایر مناطق باشد. این مناطق بیشتر در قسمت‌های جنوبی منطقه واقع بوده و در مسیر جاده‌های اصلی، خطوط برق، پل ها و همچنین زمین های زراعی قرار دارند. درنتیجه پیامدهای ناشی از این حوادث با مدیریت صحیح این موضوع می‌تواند تا قابل‌کنترل باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Evaluating the environmental risk of oil and gas pipeline routes using the Fuzzy Inference System method

نویسندگان English

Mostafa Kabolizadeh 1
Yasamin Elhaie 2
Shahin Mohammadi 3
1 Associate professor, Department of remote sensing and Geographical Information System, Faculty of earth sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran
2 PhD. Student, Department of remote sensing and Geographical Information System, Faculty of earth sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran
3 Ph.D., Department of remote sensing and Geographical Information System, Faculty of earth sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Introduction:
 Oil and gas pipeline projects face a wide range of safety and security risk factors globally, especially in oil and gas-producing countries that have unsafe environments and poor safety records. Inadequate information about the causes of pipeline failures and poor knowledge about safety and security hinder efforts to reduce such risks. Today, pipelines are widely used to transport oil and gas over long distances; Therefore, their risk assessment can help to identify related risks and take necessary measures to eliminate or reduce the resulting consequences. By reviewing the previous studies, it was found that the goal of the researchers was often to investigate the possibility and consequence of quantitative risk assessment in pipelines, while these parameters are based on the physical characteristics of pipelines and alone cannot cover all aspects of risk along the path of oil and gas pipelines. to cover At the same time, paying attention to the general Feild of the pipeline in an oil region and the uses that include these feild are very important from the environmental, sustainable development, and crisis management aspects. Finally, it seems that not paying attention to this aspect of the goal is one of the distinguishing features of this study compared to other studies. The main goal of this research is to implement a new approach to assess the riskiness of the overall Feild of pipelines on environmental resources around the Maroon oil region.
Materials and Methods:
 In this research, first, the study model of pipeline risk (from the point of view of consequences after the event) was selected. In the next step, the factors affecting the riskiness of the pipeline (in case of various incidents such as fire, explosion, toxic gas leakage, etc.) were identified and quantified. Then, the initial risk zoning map of pipelines in the study area was modeled based on MATLAB software's Mamdani fuzzy inference system. In the final step, to validate the proposed model, the results and outputs of the pipeline risk zoning model based on the fuzzy inference system were compared with the general opinion of experts. Finally, the final risk zoning map of the region was prepared and combined with the route of existing pipelines in the area. became
Results and discussion:
 Based on the risk zoning of the oil and gas pipeline route from the point of view of facilities/structures, this route mainly passes through areas with low and medium risk that have an area of 223.32 Km2, this area is equivalent to 18.4% of the total area of the oil field. However, about 1.45% of the oil field area includes areas with high risk. These areas are located in the southern parts of the Maroon oil field. According to the land use map, the use of these areas includes main roads, bridges, and power lines. The reason for the high risk in these areas is that in case of accidents related to oil and gas transmission lines, the consequences of these risks in these areas can be significant. The results of risk zoning of the pipeline route from the perspective of environmental factors show that the route of pipelines passes through areas with low, medium, and high risk. But with the difference that, compared to the zoning map of facilities and structures, the passage route is more in areas with medium to high risk. The area of these areas is equal to 750.25 Km2 and includes 61.83% of the total area of the oil area, the use of these areas is consistent with the network of waterways and flowing sand (sand hills). The final risk map shows the path of oil and gas transmission lines, which is the result of combining two environmental and technical criteria. In this map, after zoning the area in terms of low, high, medium, and high risks, the route of the pipelines was adapted to it. In the final map, the route of the current pipelines in the Maroon oil region shows a great adaptation to the areas with low and medium risk. Most of the pipelines' route corresponds to areas with low and medium risk. Finally, the adaptation of the current pipeline route in the region and risk zoning in the northern and central parts of the field showed that these areas show a low and medium level of risk. According to the results, the area of high-risk areas in the oil field is 17.55 Km2, equal to 1.4% of the total area of the Maroon oil field. The total length of oil field pipelines is 249.14 km, the total of 7 km of this route, which is equivalent to 2.8% of the total length of the lines, passes through high-risk areas. Most of this route is located in the south and southeast part of the oil field.
Conclusion:
 The results of this research show that the method of expert systems, artificial intelligence, and remote sensing can to a large extent overcome the shortcomings of the lack of zoning maps of general risk from the route of oil and gas pipelines in a vast oil area. The relationship between input and output information in the proposed fuzzy inference system was described as linguistic variables by applying expert opinion, which is more flexible and accurate compared to the classical model. Finally, based on the results of this study, the southern parts of the Maroon oil field are of high risk due to the existing pipeline route. This route is approximately 7 km long, i.e. 2.8% of the entire pipeline route. Finally, considering the above, it can be said that the above-mentioned method is effective in better decision-making by experts, because achieving a general view of the level of risk in different areas, in adopting strategies for prevention, evaluation, and correction of the area, is useful. has a lack of need for field studies, as well as reducing the burden of costs related to it, as well as saving time, are among the most important parameters that will make the research of researchers easier.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Pipelines
Risk
Natural resources
Oil and gas spills
Remote sensing
Environmental monitoring
1- Alidoosti, A., Yazdani, M., & Basiri, M., (2011). Risk assessment of critical asset using fuzzy inference system. Risk Management, 14, 77-91.
2- Aljaroudi, A., Khan, F., Akinturk, A., Haddara, M., & Thodi, P. (2015). Risk assessment of offshore crude oil pipeline failure. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 37, 101-109.
3- American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE). (2000). Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis (2nd ed.). New York: AIChE.
4- Arnaldos, J., Casal, J., Montiel, H., Sanchez-Carricondo, M., & Vilchez, J. A. (1998). Design of a computer tool for the evaluation of the consequences of accidental natural gas releases in distribution pipes. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 11, 135e148.
5- Biezma, M. V., Agudo, D., & Barron, G. (2018). A fuzzy logic method:   predicting pipeline external corrosion rate. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 163, 55-62.
6- Bonvicini, S., Antonioni, G., Morra, P., & Cozzani, V. (2015). Quantitative assessment of environmental risk due to accidental spills from onshore pipelines. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 93, 31-49.
7- Cagno, E., Caron, F., Mancini, M., & Ruggeri, F. (2000). Using AHP in determining the prior distributions on gas pipeline failures in a robust Bayesian approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 67(3), 275-284.
8- Cardone, Barbara, and Ferdinando Di Martino. )2018(. “A New Geospatial Model Integrating a Fuzzy Rule-Based System in a GIS Platform to Partition a Complex Urban System in Homogeneous Urban Contexts” Geosciences 8, no. 12: 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120440.
9- David Tian, J. D., Gopika Vinod, T.V. Santhosh,Hissam TawÞk. (2018). A Constraint-based Genetic Algorithm for Optimizing Neural Network Architectures for Detection of Loss of Coolant Accidents of Nuclear Power Plants. Neurocomputing, 322, 102-119.
10- De Masi, G., Vichi, R., Gentile, M., Bruschi, R., & Gabetta, G. (2014). A neural network predictive model of pipeline internal corrosion profile. Paper presented at the Proceeding of First International Conference on Systems Informatics, Modeling and Simulation. IEEE Computer Society Washington. DC, USA.
11- Dong Yeong Kim, K. H. Y., Geon Pil Choi, Ju Hyun Back, and Man Gyun Na. (2016). Reactor Vessel Water Level Estimation During Severe Accidents Using Cascaded Fuzzy Neural Networks.Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 3, 702-710.
12- Dziubinski, M., Frątczak, M., & Markowski, A. (2006). Aspects of risk analysis associated with major failures of fuel pipelines. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19(5),399-408
13- El-Abbasy, M. S., Senouci, A., Zayed, T., Mirahadi, F., & Parvizsedghy, L. (2014). Artificial neural network models for predicting condition of offshore oil and gas pipelines. Automation in Construction, 45, 50-65.
14- Elsayed, T. (2009). Fuzzy inference system for the risk assessment of liquefied natural gas carriers during loading/offloading at terminals. Applied Ocean Research, 31(3), 179-185.
15- Hajji, Soumaya, Naima Yahyaoui, Sonda Bousnina, Fatma Ben Brahim, Nabila Allouche, Houda Faiedh, Salem Bouri, Wafik Hachicha, and Awad M. Aljuaid. (2021). “Using a Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System Model (MFISM) for Ranking Groundwater Quality in an Agri-Environmental Context: Case of the Hammamet-Nabeul Shallow Aquifer (Tunisia)” Water 13, no. 18: 2507. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13182507.
16- Han, Z., & Weng, W. (2010). An integrated quantitative risk analysis method for natural gas pipeline network. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23(3), 428-436.
17- Han, Z., & Weng, W. (2011). Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network. Journal of hazardous materials, 189(1-2), 509-518.
18- Jamshidi, A., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Yakhchali, S. H., & Khaleghi, S. (2013). Developing a new fuzzy inference system for pipeline risk assessment. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(1), 197-208.
19- Jo, Y.-D., & Ahn, B. J. (2005). A method of quantitative risk assessment for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas. Journal of hazardous materials, 123(1-3), 1-12.
20- Kalinic, M., & Krisp, J. M. (2019). Fuzzy inference approach in traffic congestion detection. Annals of GIS, 25(4), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2019.1675760.
21- Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. 1981. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1(1), 11e27.
22- Kosa Golić, (2019).  A Fuzzy Model for Assessing Impacts of Natural Gas Pipeline Systems on Environment, Journal of Advanced Management Science, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 47-53.
23- Lu, L., Liang, W., Zhang, L., Zhang, H., Lu, Z., & Shan, J. (2015). A comprehensive risk evaluation method for natural gas pipelines by combining a risk matrix with a bow-tie model. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 25, 124-133.
24- Malinowska A, Cui X, Salimi E, Ryszard H. (2021). A Novel Fuzzy Approach to Gas Pipeline Risk Assessment Under Influence of Ground Movement. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology.
25- Markowski, A. S., & Mannan, M. S. 2009. Fuzzy logic for piping risk assessment (pfLOPA).Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22(6), 921-927.
26- Markowski, A. S., Mannan, M. S., & Bigoszewska, A. (2009). Fuzzy logic for process safety analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22(6), 695-702.
27- Qiaoyan Yu; Lei Hou; Yanhao Li; Chong Chai; Kai Yang; Jiaquan Liu, (2023). Pipeline Failure Assessment Based on Fuzzy Bayesian Network and AHP: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice 2023-02 Journal article.
28- Raeihagh, H., Behbahaninia, A,. Macki Aleagha, M., (2020). Risk assessment of sour gas inter-phase onshore pipeline using ANN and Fuzzy inference system – case study: The South Pars Gas field.
29- Rangzan K,  Kablizadeh M,  Mansour Naeimi,E.(2015). The Zoning of Earthquake risk by using fuzzy inference system and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, RS and GIS for Natural Resources, Pages 1-18 ( in Persian).
30- Shahriar, A., Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. (2012). Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: A sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 25(3), 505-523.
31- Sklavounos, S., & Rigas, F. (2006). Estimation of safety distances in the vicinity of fuel gas pipelines. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19, 24e31.
32- Zadeh, L.A,(1973).”Outline of a new approach to the analysis of  complex  systems  and  decision  processes,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 28-44, Jan. 1973.
33- Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information Contr ol, 8, 338.