فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

ارزیابی توان سرزمین برای توسعه طبیعت گردی با استفاده از مدل‌های TOPSIS و ZLS - مطالعه موردی: حوضه آبخیز نور – نوشهر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 کارشناس ارشد رشته ارزیابی و آمایش سرزمین. دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان – ایران
2 دانشیار گروه علوم و مهندسی محیط زیست. دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان – ایران
3 استادیار گروه علوم و مهندسی محیط زیست. دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان – ایران
چکیده
ارزیابی توان بوم ­شناختی گامی مؤثر و ابزاری مناسب برای هدایت فعالیت ­ها و کاربری­ های جاری در سرزمین به سوی توسعه ­ای پایدار است. هدف از پژوهش حاضر، بررسی توان توسعه­ ی طبیعت­ گردی با استفاده از ترکیب روش های AHP، TOPSIS و ZLS و انتخاب بهترین لکه­ ها با تأکید بر معیارهای اجتماعی – اقتصادی در حوضه آبخیز نور-نوشهر است. در پژوهش صورت گرفته، از 10 معیار ارتفاع، شیب، جهت شیب، شاخص تفاوت پوشش گیاهی نرمال شده (NDVI)، کاربری اراضی، فاصله از آبراهه، فاصله از جاده اصلی، فاصله از مناطق سیلابی، فاصله از گسل و فاصله از نقاط زمین لغزش استفاده شد. روش AHP برای وزن ­دهی به معیارها مورد استفاده قرار گرفت و در نرم افزار ArcGIS 10.5 نقشه توان سرزمین برای توسعه طبیعت گردی تهیه شد. پس از آن، با استفاده از روش ZLS، هفت منطقه به عنوان مناطق با توان بالا انتخاب شدند. سپس این هفت منطقه با استفاده از روش TOPSIS و انتخاب پنج معیار اجتماعی – اقتصادی؛ تنوع منطقه، میزان بکر بودن، مجموع جمعیت در فاصله پنج کیلومتری از منطقه، فاصله از جاده و میانگین نقشه تناسب مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند و در نهایت بهترین مناطق برای توسعه طبیعت­ گردی انتخاب شدند. نتایج نقشه طبقه­ بندی توان منطقه نشان می­دهد 21269 (8.63 %) هکتار از منطقه بدون توان، 48617 (19.71 %) هکتار دارای توان کم، 66535 (26.98 %) هکتار دارای توان متوسط، 103589 (39.99 %) هکتار دارای توان بالا و 6634 (2.70 %) هکتار از منطقه دارای توان بسیار بالا هستند. همچنین نتایج حاصل از بررسی معیارهای اجتماعی – اقتصادی و روش TOPSIS نشان می­ دهد که مناطق 2، 5 و 1 به ترتیب با امتیازهای 0.8188، 0.7868 و 0.6506 بهترین مکان­ ها برای توسعه طبیعت ­گردی منطقه هستند. مطالعات صورت گرفته و نتایج این پژوهش نشان می­ دهد که تهیه نقشه توان منطقه بر اساس روش AHP و رتبه­ بندی و انتخاب مناطق نهایی برای توسعه طبیعت­ گردی با روش TOPSIS، دارای قدرت بالایی برای بررسی توسعه طبیعت­ گردی بوده و نتایج قابل قبولی را ارائه می­ دهد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Assessment of land potential for nature tourism development using Multi Criteria Evaluation (MCE), TOPSIS and ZLS methods - Case study: Nour - Nowshahr watershed

نویسندگان English

Zahra Maleki 1
Alireza Mikaeili Tabrizi 2
Hamid Reza Kamyab 3
1 MSc. Land evaluation and land use planning. Gorgan University of agricultural sciences and natural resources, Iran
2 Associate professor, Gorgan University of agricultural sciences and natural resources, Iran
3 Assistant professor, Gorgan University of agricultural sciences and natural resources, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Introduction
In the current era, following the occurrence of environmental crises, the destruction of resources and the creation of obstacles on the way to sustainable development, it is necessary to carry out programs based on the recognition and assessment of ecological potential so that exploitation in It should be fed continuously from the environment and the natural values of the environment should be preserved. Therefore, after formulating development strategies and implementing social economic programs, geographical survey of the region and recognition of its environmental capabilities and then determining the ecological potential of the land for different uses with the aim of continuous exploitation with the least Destruction and preservation of the environment is an inevitable necessity. The ecological capacity of the land allows the planner to determine the direction and solutions of the region's development based on the region's capabilities, and provide a plan that fits the conditions of the region. Evaluation of the ecological potential is an effective step and a suitable tool to direct the current activities and uses in the land towards sustainable development. FAO defines "land suitability assessment" as an assessment process that considers the performance of land when used for a specific purpose. The assessment process is directed towards optimal land use by providing important information about the opportunities and constraints in using a given land.
Materials & Methods
According to the review of various library sources as well as the conditions of the region, 10 criteria of Elevation, slope, Aspect, distance to main roads, distance to waterways, distance to fault, distance to landslide points, distance to flood plains, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and land use were investigated as different criteria for capacity measurement. To study the capacity of the studied area and to prepare suitable areas for the development of Ecotourism, the following steps were carried out; A): Assessment of land suitability to check the capacity of the region for tourism development using the MCE method: First step) defining the set of evaluation criteria (information layers),  The second step) standardizing the criteria, The third step) defining the weights of each criterion, Fourth step) preparation of the final map: in the last step, the obtained weights were multiplied in the required layers and then added together. The fifth step) using the final desirability layer produced at the end of the fourth step, places that have a higher value than other areas, using the location method based on suitability and area (ZLS) as suitable places. They are selected for the development of nature tourism. B): Selection of the most important socio-economic parameters and ranking of the spots: the values of these indicators were extracted for the selected spots and at the end, the rank of each spot was determined using the TOPSIS method.
Results & Discussion
The results of the AHP questionnaire show that the Criteria of slope, Elevation and NDVI are the most important Criteria affecting the development of Ecotourism in this region. The results obtained for the development of Ecotourism in the studied area show that 21,269 (8.63%) hectares of the area are without capacity, and 6634 (2.70%) hectares are of the area with very high capacity. Due to the fact that a minimum area is required for the development of concentrated Ecotourism, in this study, seven areas with areas of at least 100 hectares were selected from the very high capacity category. Based on the results obtained from the AHP method, respectively, the indicators of the diversity of the area, the amount of pristine, the distance to road, the total population within 5 kilometers of the area and the average suitable map have the most importance on the selection of the best area for the development of Ecotourism. The results of the TOPSIS method show that region 2 is the best place for the development of Ecotourism in this watershed with a score of 0.8188. Then regions 5 and 1 were selected as the second and third regions with scores of 0.7868 and 0.6506 respectively. The places with the lowest rank are regions No. 4 and 3 with a score of 0.3197 and 0.0464 respectively.
Conclusion
Among the different capabilities of each region, tourist attractions are one of the most important natural resources in each region, and are important factors in attracting tourists and attracting capital, and thus are the main basis for sustainable development for the region. The results of the survey show that all three selected final regions are in the central part of Noor city and region 2 has the largest area (370.759 hectares) in terms of area. Also, according to the average map, it is equal to 0.928 and in terms of access, it is 144 meters away from the main road, and its virginity is 80%. Various studies (Balist et al., 2019), (Zarei et al., 2013), (Pour Ahmed et al., 2013) in the world show the superiority of this model (the combination of AHP method and TOPSIS method) over other models confirmed in their studies.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

AHP
TOPSIS
Nour
Nowshahr
Ecotourism
Land Capacity
  1. Abrehe, S., Girma, A., & Nigusse, A. G. (2021). Potential ecotourism site suitability evaluation for sustainable natural resource management in Kafta Sheraro National Park (KSNP), north-western Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Ecotourism, 20(4), 341-370.‏
  2. Akbaroghli, F., & Vafaei, M. (2019). The Role of Tourism Potential Areas of Mashhad Metropolitan Sphere of Influence in Sustainable Urban Development, Case Study: Abardeh Village. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches, 10(20), 77-96. doi: 10.30473/grup.2020.7080
  3. Akbulak, C. (2010). Analitik hiyerarşi süreci ve coğrafi bilgi sistemleri ile Yukarı Kara Menderes Havzası’nın arazi kullanımı uygunluk analizi. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 557-576.‏
  4. Akıncı, H., Özalp, A. Y., & Turgut, B. (2013). Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 97, 71-82.‏
  5. Aliani, H., BabaieKafaky, S., Saffari, A., & Monavari, S. M. (2017). Land evaluation for ecotourism development—an integrated approach based on FUZZY, WLC, and ANP methods. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 14, 1999-2008.‏
  6. Amiri, F., & Shariff, A. R. B. M. (2012). Application of geographic information systems in land-use suitability evaluation for beekeeping: A case study of Vahregan watershed (Iran). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(1), 89-97.‏
  7. Anabestani, Ali Akbar, Noori Zamanabadi, Hedayatollah, & Mollanorozi, Masoumeh. (2020). Ecological capability evaluation with the aim of developing sustainable rural tourism using WLC and Fuzzy methods in GIS environment-Case study: Neyshabur County. Geographical Data, 29(115 ), 161-177. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/952231/en
  8. Asghaarpoor, mohammad javad. (2012). Multi-criteria decision making. Tehran University Publications, 11. 400p.
  9. Azar. Adel, Faraji, hojjat. (2007). Fuzzy management science. Publications of Mehraban Nash Institute of Books. First edition. 320 p.
  10. Balist, J., Heydarzadeh, H., & Salehi, E. (2019). Modeling, evaluation, and zoning of Marivan county ecotourism potential using fuzzy logic, FAHP, and TOPSIS. Geographica Pannonica, 23(1).‏
  11. FAO/CSR. Reconnaissance Land Resource Survey, 1: 250,000 Scale, Atlas Procedure, Bogor. FAO Minist. Agric. Gov. Indones. 1983, 4, 1–106.
  12. Heshmat nia, Behnaz, Shayesteh, Kamran, & parvar, zahra. (2019). Site Suitability Evaluation for Ecotourism Using GIS & AHP: A Case Study of Hamedan Township. Journal of environmental science and technology, 21(6 (85) ), 227-241. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/363525/en
  13. Jafari, Z., Mikaeeali Tabrizy, A.R., Mohammadzadeh, M., & Abdi, O.. (2012). Evaluation of ecotourism competence in Golestan National Park through weighted linear combination method. Renewable natural resources research, 2(4 (Serial Number 6)), 25-37. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/212304/en
  14.  
  15. Kushwaha, S. P. S., Mukhopadhyay, S., Prasad, V. H., & Kumar, S. (2010). Sustainable development planning in Pathri Rao sub-watershed using geospatial techniques. Current science, 1479-1486.‏
  16. Mahdavi A, Niknezhad M, Karami O. (2014). Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Land for Ecotourism Development) Case Study: Khorram-Abad Country) . Ecol Iran For. 2(4), 56-69.
  17. Malczewski, J. (2004). GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progress in planning, 62(1), 3-65.‏
  18. Mansour, S., Al-Awhadi, T., & Al-Hatrushi, S. (2020). Geospatial based multi-criteria analysis for ecotourism land suitability using GIS & AHP: a case study of Masirah Island, Oman. Journal of Ecotourism, 19(2), 148-167.‏
  19. Mokarram, M., & Aminzadeh, F. (2010). GIS-based multicriteria land suitability evaluation using ordered weight averaging with fuzzy quantifier: a case study in Shavur Plain, Iran. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38(2), 508-512.‏
  20. Poorahmad, A., Poorahmad, A., Poorahmad, A., Ashlaghi, M., Manochehri, A., Ahar, H., Manochehri, A., & Ramazani, M. (2014). The location hospitals using Fuzzy Logic combining AHP and TOPSIS environment ARCGIS. Geography and Environmental Planning, 25(2), 1-24.
  21. Ranjbari, Ruqiyeh, Danekar, Afshin. And riazi, Borhan. (2008). Evaluation of the environmental potential of the Nayband marine coastal national park in Bushehr province for the purposes of recreational use. Journal of Environmental Sciences and Technology. 11(4). 255.
  22. Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1974). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. NASA Spec. Publ, 351(1), 309.‏
  23. Salemi, M., Jozi, S. A., Malmasi, S., & Rezaian, S. (2019). Evaluation of carrying capacity in ecotourism development (Case study: Southern Karkheh protected area). Geography (Regional Planning), 9(2), 53-63.‏
  24. Salman Mahini, Abdolrasoul (2012). The plan of sensitivity assessment of the coasts of the northern provinces
  25. Salman Mahini, Abdolrasoull, Reeazi, Borhan, Naeemi, Babak, Babaei Kafaki, Sasan, & Javadia Larijani, Attieh. (2009). Ecotourism capability assessment of the Behshahr area using multi-criteria evaluation by using GIS:. Journal of environmental science and technology, 11(1 (Special Issue 40)), 187-198. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/87124/en
  26. Shomalizadeh, Farkhondeh, Dashti, Seyedeh Soolmaz, & Hemadi, Kazem. (2015). analysis and evaluation of Potentials and Ecotourism development Strategiec. Journal of Wetland Ecobiology, 7(25), 5-20. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/174803/en
  27. Tabrizi, Nazanin, & Zahedi Kalaki, Ebrahim. (2018). Evaluation of Ecological Capability and identification of Suitable areas to Develop Sustainable Ecotourism using MCE and WLC method Case Study: Gorgan. Geographic space, 18(63 ), 207-224. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/91597/en
  28. Ziaeian Firouz Abadi, Parviz, Khaledi, SH., Khandan, Sakineh, & Alizadeh, Anoush. (2010). Agroclimatological Zonation of citrus in Lorestan province with index overaly logic and fuzzy logic. environmental based territorial Planning (Amayesh), 3(8), 21-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/130549/en