فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

ارزیابی استعداد لرزه خیزی کلان شهرهای ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
دانش آموخته دکتری ژئومورفولوژی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
موقعیت زمین­ ساختی ایران سبب شده است تا این کشور پتانسیل لرزه ­خیزی بالایی داشته باشد. با توجه به اینکه کلان­ شهرها پتانسیل آسیب ­پذیری بالایی در برابر مخاطره زمین­ لرزه دارند، در این پژوهش به آنالیز زمین­­ لرزه­ های رخ داده در حریم کلا­ن­ شهرها (تهران، مشهد، اصفهان، کرج، شیراز، تبریز، قم، اهواز و کرمانشاه) و همچنین شناسایی کلان­ شهرهای آسیب­ پذیر در برابر مخاطره زمین­ لرزه پرداخته شده است. در پژوهش حاضر از اطلاعات مربوط به کانون زمین ­­لرزه­ های ثبت شده در ایران طی سال ­های 1286 تا 1402 (1907 تا 2023 میلادی)، اطلاعات جمعیتی کلان­ شهرهای ایران، اطلاعات آماری مربوط به وضعیت ساخت­ و­سازهای کلان­ شهرها و همچنین اطلاعات به دست آمده از تصاویر ماهواره ­­ای، به­ عنوان مهم­ ترین داده­ های تحقیق استفاده شده است. مهم ­ترین ابزارهای پژوهش ArcGIS و SPSS بوده اند. همچنین در این تحقیق از مدل تحلیل سلسله ­مراتبی به­ منظور وزن ­دهی به پارامترها استفاده شده است. بر اساس نتایج حاصله، در طی سا­ل­ های 1286 تا 1402­، 999 زمین ­لرزه با بزرگای بیش از 3 ریشتر تا شعاع 100 کیلومتری از کلان­ شهرها رخ داده است که بیش­ترین تعداد زمین ­لرزه در محدوده کلان ­شهرهای شیراز، اهواز و کرمانشاه بوده است، به ­طوری­ که در محدوده این کلان­ شهرها به ترتیب 390، 186 و 147 زمین ­لرزه رخ داده است. همچنین نتایج ارزیابی وضعیت آسیب ­پذیری کلان­ شهرها نشان داده است که کلان­ شهر شیراز با مجموع 17.68 امتیاز، آسیب ­پذیرترین کلان­ شهر کشور در برابر مخاطره زمین­ لرزه محسوب می­ شود. بعد از این کلان­ شهر، کلان­ شهرهای کرمانشاه و تهران به ترتیب با 13.12 و 10.87 امتیاز، دارای بالاترین پتانسیل آسیب ­پذیری هستند. مجموع نتایج حاصله از این پژوهش نشان داده است که کلان­ شهرهای شیراز، کرمانشاه و تهران پتانسیل آسیب ­­پذیری بیش­تری در برابر مخاطره زمین­ لرزه دارند، بنابراین باید کنترل و نظارت بیش­تری بر کیفیت ساخت­­ و­­سازها و روند افزایشی جمعیت در این کلان ­شهرها صورت گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Evaluating the seismic potential of megacities in Iran

نویسنده English

Hamid Ganjaeian
Ph.D. of Geomorphology, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
Iran is one of the countries that is prone to natural hazards due to its geographical situation. One of the risks that has always threatened Iran is the risk of earthquakes. The land of Iran, as a part of the active tectonic zone of the Alps-Himalayas, has been affected by many tectonic activities over time, such as the appearance of the Zagros-Makran and Alborz-Kope Dagh mountain ranges in the Iranian plateau as a result of subduction of the Arabian plates. The Indian Ocean is one of the landforms resulting from this convergence. According to the geological situation of the Iranian plateau, this plateau is facing many disturbances and this problem has caused Iran to be one of the earthquake-prone countries in the world. Earthquake is the most important natural hazard that is always associated with a lot of human and financial losses. Due to its unpredictability and its power, this hazard has faced serious challenges in the seismic regions of the world. In fact, large earthquakes are one of the most destructive natural disasters, which often lead to widespread casualties and many deaths, and many cities are vulnerable to large earthquakes. Among the areas that are vulnerable to the risk of earthquakes are the metropolises because they house a large part of the country's population. According to the statistics of 2015, the metropolitan cities of Tehran, Mashhad, Isfahan, Karaj, Shiraz, Tabriz, Qom, Ahvaz and Kermanshah include about 27% of the country's population. Due to the importance of the subject, in this research, the seismic status of Iran's metropolises has been evaluated.
2-Materials and methods
In this research, information related to the epicenter of earthquakes recorded in Iran during the years 1286 to 1402 (1907 to 2023), demographic information of Iranian metropolises, statistical information related to the state of constructions of metropolises, and also The information obtained from satellite images has been used as the most important research data. The most important research tools are ArcGIS (to prepare the required maps) and SPSS (to analyze the data). Also, in this research, the Analytical Hierarchy (AHP) model was used in order to weight the parameters. According to the desired goals, this research has been done in two general stages. In the first stage, a 100 km boundary is defined for each metropolis, and then the earthquakes that occurred in this area are identified. In the following, the earthquakes that occurred in metropolitan areas have been analyzed in terms of number and size. In the second stage, based on 6 parameters, the state of vulnerability of metropolises has been evaluated. After evaluating the metropolises in terms of the desired parameters, first the parameters were normalized and then the parameters were weighted using the AHP model.
 3-Discussion and results
The results of the evaluation of earthquakes that occurred in the outskirts of 100 kilometers of metropolises have shown that the largest number of earthquakes with 390 recorded cases was related to the outskirts of Shiraz metropolis, and Isfahan and Qom metropolises recorded 19 and 20 respectively. Have the least number of earthquakes. Also, the results of the survey of the number of earthquakes with a magnitude greater than 6 on the Richter scale have shown that the outskirts of the metropolises of Shiraz and Kermanshah had the largest number of earthquakes with 4 earthquakes, and the outskirts of the metropolises of Isfahan and Ahvaz There has been no earthquake with a magnitude greater than 6 on the Richter scale. Considering that in addition to earthquakes, other factors are also effective in determining the vulnerability of metropolises against earthquake hazards, in this study, population parameters, population density, percentage of open space and percentage of worn-out fabric are also used. Has been According to the results, the largest population was related to Tehran city. The highest population density was related to the city of Mashhad. The highest percentage of worn out fabric was related to the city of Tehran and the lowest percentage of open space was related to the city of Tehran.
 4-Conclusion
The results of this research have shown that Iran's metropolises have different seismic potentials due to their geo-structural position, and also, under the influence of various population factors and constructions, different potentials in terms of damage. They are resistant to earthquakes. In this research, in order to investigate the seismic status of metropolises, the earthquakes that occurred within 100 kilometers of them have been analyzed. According to the results, during the years 1286 to 1402, 999 earthquakes with a magnitude of more than 3 on the Richter scale occurred within a radius of 100 km from these metropolises, 15 of which had a magnitude of more than 6 on the Richter scale. Is. The results of the analysis of earthquakes have shown that the largest number of earthquakes occurred in the metropolitan areas of Shiraz, Ahvaz and Kermanshah, so that 390, 186 and 147 earthquakes occurred in these metropolitan areas, respectively. The lowest number of earthquakes with 19 and 20 cases respectively was related to the metropolitan areas of Isfahan and Qom. Also, the largest number of earthquakes with a magnitude greater than 6 on the Richter scale was related to the metropolitan areas of Shiraz and Kermanshah. The results of this section have shown that the seismic status of Iran's metropolises has been very different, and considering that in addition to the number of earthquakes, various human parameters are also effective in the degree of vulnerability to earthquakes, in this research Based on different parameters, the state of vulnerability of metropolises was evaluated. Based on the results, Shiraz metropolis with a total score of 17.68 is considered the most vulnerable metropolis in the country against earthquake risk. After this metropolis, Kermanshah and Tehran metropolises have the highest vulnerability potential with 13.12 and 10.87 points, respectively. Also, Isfahan metropolis with a total of 2.75 points has the lowest vulnerability potential among the metropolises of the country, and after that, Ahvaz and Qom metropolises have the lowest with 5.72 and 6.66 points, respectively. They are potential vulnerabilities.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Earthquake
Vulnerability
Megacity
Iran
  1. Aloisio, A., Rosso, M.M., De Leo, A.M., Fragiacomo, M & Basi, M., 2023. Damage classification after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake using multinomial logistic regression and neural network. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103959
  2. Bartels, S.A & Van Rooyen, M.J., 2012. Medical complications associated with earthquakes. Lancet, 379. 748-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60887-8
  3. Bodenmann, L., Reuland, Y & Stojadinovic, B., 2023. Dynamic post-earthquake updating of regional damage estimates using Gaussian Processes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109201
  4. Bossard, A., 2014. Analysis of the Poisson distribution applicability to the Japanese seismic activity. International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics, 93, 430- 435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJDS.2018.10011823
  5. Coisson, E., Ferretti, D., & Lenticchia, E., 2017. Analysis of damage mechanisms suffered by Italian fortified buildings hit by earthquakes in the last 40 years. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0172-0
  6. Douglas, J., Ulrich, T & Negulescu, C., 2013. Risk-targeted seismic design maps for mainland France. Natural Hazards, 65(3), 1999–2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0460-6
  7. Dunand, F & Guéguen, P., 2012. Comparison between seismic and domestic risk in moderate seismic hazard prone region: the Grenoble City (France) test site. Nat Hazards Earth Syst, (12), 12:511–526. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-511-2012
  8. Farfel, A., Assa, A., Amir, I., Bader, I., Bartal, C & Kreiss, Y., 2011. Haiti earthquake 2010: a field hospital pediatric perspective. Eur J Pediatr, 170, 519-525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-011-1423-8
  9. Ganjaeian, H., 2024. Spatial and temporal analysis of earthquakes in Iran During the years 1907 to 2023. Geography and Environmental Hazards, 13(4), 222-243. https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2024.87246.1470  (In Persian)
  10. Ganjaeian, H., 2023. Analysis of the tectonic status of the northwestern Zagros anticlines and its relationship with seismic centers. Geography and Environmental Hazards, 12(4), 275-290. https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2022.75370.1182 (In Persian)
  11. Ganjaeian, H., Rezaei Arefi, M., Peysoozi, T & Emami, K., 2021. Zonning susceptible areas of landslide using WLC and OWA methods -A case study in Mountain cliff Khan, Iran. Sustainable Earth Trends, 1(2), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.52547/sustainearth.1.2.43
  12. Ganjaeian, H., Yamani, M., Goorabi, A & Maghsoudi, M., 2020. Adaptation of Morphotectonic Indices with Seismic Centers in Zagros Northwest (Sirvan and Qarahsu Basins). Geography and Environmental Planning, 31(4), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2021.124247.1335 (In Persian)
  13. Ganjaeian, H., Yamani, M., Goorabi, M & Maghsoudi, M., 2024. Evaluating the Impacts of Earthquake in Ezgele, Kermanshah (Iran) (Occurred on 2017/11/12). Current Research in Environmental Science and Ecology Letters, 1(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.33140/CRESEL.01.01.06
  14. Ghanbari, A., Saleki leki, M & Ghasemi, M., 2012. Zoning the degree of vulnerability of cities against earthquake risk (case example: Tabriz city). Geography and Environmental Hazards, 2(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.22067/geo.v2i1.15617 (In Persian)
  15. Goorabi, A & Emami, K., 2016. The effects of new land construction on the morphological changes of the drainage basins of Makran coast, southeast of Iran. Quantitative Geomorphology Research, 6 (1), 74-89. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22519424.1396.6.1.5.2 (In Persian)
  16. Hashemi, M & Ali mohammadi S., 2010. Investigating temporal-spatial patterns in data related to historical earthquakes in Iran, using indices and spatial statistics models. Iranian Remote Sensing and GIS Journal, 2 (2), 55-70. https://gisj.sbu.ac.ir/article_94494.html (In Persian)
  17. Iran Statistics Center., 2015. Demographic information related to the metropolises of the country. https://amar.org.ir (In Persian)
  18. Lalepour, M., Khairizadeh, M & Zakeri, M., 2022. Assessing the vulnerability of urban areas to earthquake crises (Case study: Varzeqan city neighborhoods). Natural Environmental Hazards, 11 (31), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2022.33931.1656 (In Persian)
  19. Moarrab, Y., Sepehrzad, B & Naderi, M., 2020. Evaluation of City’s Structural Vulnerability to Earthquake with Non-Active Defense Approach (Case Study: District 2 of Tehran). Passive Defense, 11(2), 31-43. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20086849.1399.11.2.4.5 (In Persian)
  20. Mohammadkhan, S., Ganjaeian, H., Shahri, S & Abbaszadeh, A., 2019. Predicting the trend of urban development towards hazardous areas using multi-temporal images (Case study: Marivan city). Sepehr, 28 (110), 117-107. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2019.36615 (In Persian)
  21. Nagaresh, H., 2005. Earthquake, cities and faults. Geographical Research, 37(52), 110-93. https://sid.ir/paper/378481/fa (In Persian)
  22. Nayyeri, H., Salari, M., Ganjaeian, H & Amani, K., 2017. Geomorphological Assessment of Land Suitability for the Physical Expansion of Sanandaj City Applying Restricted Areas. Research in the geography of urban planning. 5 (1). 127-145. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2017.63213 (In Persian)
  23. Negahban, S., Ganjaeian, H., Fereidoni-Kordestani, M & Cheshme-Sefidi, Z., 2019. Assessing the physical development of cities and expansion towards geomorphologically restricted areas using LCM (Case study: Sanandaj city). Natural Environment Hazards, 8(20), 52-39. https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2018.21943.1317 (In Persian)
  24. Negahban, S., Ganjaeian, H., Saeedi, S & Ghasemi, A., 2020. Study of vertical displacement caused by 2019 Turkmanchay earthquake based on InSAR method. Earth and space physics, 46(3), 445-456. https://doi.org/10.22059/jesphys.2020.295046.1007182 (In Persian)
  25. Negahban, S., Peysoozi, T., Ganjaeian, H & Norozi, M., 2021. Identification of landslide and vertical displacement prone areas using radar images (Case study: urban area and urban outskirts of Lavasan). Geography and Environmental Hazards, 10(3), 18-1. https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2021.71728.1094 (In Persian)
  26. Nojwan, K., Barzegari, A & Mohammadian, M., 2020. Probabilistic earthquake hazard Analysis with considering Risk-Based concept (Case study of olefin 14). Disaster Prev. Manag. Know. 10 (1), 90-74. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.23225955.1399.10.1.6.2 (In Persian)
  27. Omi, T., Ogata, Y., Hirata, Y & Aihara, K., 2016. Forecasting large aftershocks within one day after the mainshock. Scientific Report, 3. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-10763-3
  28. Pan, S. T., Cheng, Y.Y & Lin, C.H., 2019. Extrication time and earthquake-related mortality in the 2016 Taiwan earthquake. Formosan Medical Association, 11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2019.07.013
  29. Parvizian, A & Maleki, S., 2022. The vulnerability of urban areas to the risk of earthquakes based on the IHWP model, (case study: areas of the 6th district of Ahvaz metropolis). Amish Sarmeen, 14 (2), 594-571. https://doi.org/10.22059/jtcp.2022.335903.670284 (In Persian)
  30. Rangzan, K., Kabolizade, M., karimi, D & Mansout naeimi, E., 2016. Earthquake Risk Zoning for locating Safe Areas at the time of Natural Hazards Events Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms and GIS (Case Study: District “One” of Ahvaz City). Geography and Environmental Planning, 27 (3), 66-49. https://doi.org/10.22108/gep.2017.98164 (In Persian)
  31. Salari, M., Nayyeri, H., Amani, K & Ganjaeian, H., 2017., Selecting suitable locations for Kamyaran urban development with a risk analysis approach based on the application of geomorphological prohibited areas. Environmental Risk Management, 4(4), 419-436. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhsci.2018.252694.341 (In Persian)
  32. Salari, N., Entezzri, M & Khabazi, M., 2022. Urban Vulnerability Rating against Earthquake Hazard Using ELECTRE FUZZY Model: A Case Study of Kerman City. Geography and Environmental Planning, 33 (4), 113-134. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20085362.1401.33.4.7.1 (In Persian)
  33. Tahriri, M. H., Safari, H., 2023. Investigating spatial and temporal changes of seismic parameters along the internal fault system. Scientific Quarterly of Earth Sciences, 33(3), 96-85. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.10237429.1402.33.3.6.7 (In Persian)
  34. Tang, A & Wen, A., 2009. An intelligent simulation system for earthquake disaster assessment. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (5), 871-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.03.003
  35. Wang, J.P & Chin Chang, S.U., 2015. Evidence in support of seismic hazard following Poisson distribution. Physica A, 424, 207-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.01.026
  36. Wang, J.P., Huang, D., Chang, S.C & Wu, Y.M., 2014. New evidence and perspective to the Poisson process and earthquake temporal distribution from 55,000 events around Taiwan since 1900. Natural Hazards Review, 15(1), 38- 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000110
  37. Xu, J & Lu, Y., 2018. Towards an earthquake-resilient world: from post-disaster reconstruction to pre-disaster prevention. Environmental Hazards, 17 (4), 296-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2018.1500878