فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

مدل سازی دیجیتال پل‌های جاده‌ای ایران با استفاده از CityGML

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد سیستم‌های اطلاعات جغرافیایی ، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
2 استادیار گروه سنجش از دور و سیستم‌های اطلاعات جغرافیایی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه سنجش از دور و سیستم های اطلاعات جغرافیایی ، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
ایجاد مدل‌های دیجیتال با دقت و جزئیات مناسب از راه ­ها و جاده ­ها یکی از نیازهای رو به رشد در حوزه مدیریتی و اجرایی مرتبط با راه است. پل‌ها اجزای مهمی در زیرساخت‌های ترافیکی هستند که ماهیت سه بعدی آن­ها در فرآیند برداشت، بازرسی و نگهداری نقش اساسی دارد. بر این اساس، مقاله حاضر با هدف مدل سازی سه بعدی مکانی و دیجیتالی پل‌های جاده‌ای، با استفاده از استاندارد CityGML  و به وسیله تکنیک‌های نقشه­ برداری، فتوگرامتری وGIS  انجام شده است. برای این منظور عناصر کلیدی ساختاری پل مانند پیلون‌ها و مهاربندها با برچسب BridgeConstructionElement  و سایر اجزاء مانند رمپ‌ها، نرده ­ها و آنتن ­ها با برچسب BridgePart و BridgeInstallation در قالب ماژول Bridge در  استاندارد CityGML تعریف شده‌اند. مدل‌ سه‌بعدی پل در سطح جزئیات LOD3 اجرا شده است که برای مدل ­سازی رویه­ های خارجی سازه ها مانند ساختمان­ ها و پل استفاده می­ شود. به علاوه مدل­ سه بعدی عوارض مرتبط با پل شامل توپوگرافی، مبلمان شهری، کاربری زمین و عوارض آبی در سطح جزئیات مربوطه از سطح 1 تا سطح 3 تعریف و اجرا شده‌اند. به عنوان نمونه مطالعاتی یک پل جاده­ای با نام خیرودکنار واقع در محور آمل-چالوس در شهرستان نوشهر عکسبرداری شده و سپس با استفاده از الگوریتم SfM ابر نقاط و بدنبال آن اجزای پل استخراج شده ­اند. به این ترتیب، مدل ­سه بعدی پل براساس مدل توسعه داده شده CityGML ایجاد شده است. نتایج نشان می‌دهند که استاندارد CityGML امکان ایجاد مدل‌های سه‌بعدی از پل­ ها را به صورت یکپارچه با سایر عوارض محیطی فراهم می ­آورد. مدل حاصله ویژگی‌های لازم برای نمایش سه بعدی وانجام تحلیل­ های هندسی و توپولوژیک برای کمک به مدیریت یکپارچه سازه، عارضه آبی و روند ترافیکی پل‌ها را دارد. روش پیشنهادی که مبتنی بر عکسبرداری است امکان مدل­ سازی با دقت 5 سانتی متر برای پل های با طول دهانه بزرگتر از 4 متر و ارتفاع آزاد بالاتر از 2 متر را فراهم می­ نماید.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Digital modeling of road bridges in Iran utilizing the CityGML

نویسندگان English

Nasrin Mollaie Kohnesara 1
Hani Rezayan 2
Javad Sadidi 3
1 MSc in Geographic Information Systems, Faculty of geographical sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant professor of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems, Faculty of geographical sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate professor of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems, Faculty of geographical sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
This paper presents an approach for digitally modeling road bridges in Iran using the CityGML standard. The goal of this study is to spatially model bridge data by leveraging CityGML standards and GIS. The recommended method enabled modeling bridges with at least 4m length and 2m free height to be modeled with 5cm precision.
Introduction
The demand for precise 3D modeling of urban infrastructure is rising due to its applications in urban planning, infrastructure management, and disaster mitigation. Bridges, as crucial components of transportation networks, play a significant role in facilitating traffic flow and connecting regions. However, their complex 3D structures and interactions with environmental features, such as rivers and road networks, pose challenges in modeling and analysis. Accurate 3D models are necessary for structural analysis, maintenance planning, and traffic management.
CityGML, an international standard for 3D urban modeling, enables the integration of semantic, geometric, and topological data into a unified framework. Unlike traditional modeling methods that often lack standardization and interoperability, CityGML, with its modular data structures, covers various urban features, including bridges. This study focuses on using CityGML to develop a precise 3D model of road bridges in Iran at Level of Detail 3 (LOD3). The objective is to create a semantically rich and geometrically accurate model that supports advanced analyses and decision-making in bridge management.
Materials & Methods
Data Collection
The study was conducted on the Kheiroudkenar Bridge, located in Nowshahr, Iran, at geographic coordinates 36.62798°N and 51.58104°E. This bridge, with a length of 70 meters, width of 12 meters, and free height of 5 meters, serves as a critical transportation link. A UAV equipped with a high-resolution camera (focal length: 8.8 mm; spatial resolution: 0.0024 mm) was used to capture 810 overlapping images. Flights were conducted at four different altitudes (4–15 meters) and camera angles between 30° and 90° to ensure complete coverage of the bridge and its surroundings. To ensure precise georeferencing of the data, ground control points (GCPs) were collected using multi-frequency GPS devices with 3cm precision and located where they had high visibility in the images.
Data Processing
Images were processed using Agisoft Metashape and the Structure-from-Motion (SfM) algorithm. This technique automatically aligns overlapping images and generates a dense point cloud with over six million points. SfM's capability to estimate camera parameters, such as focal length and lens distortion, makes it suitable for creating accurate 3D models from aerial imagery.
The initial point clouds were de-noised to remove outliers and then segmented into distinct bridge components, including the deck, supports, railings, and ramps. This segmentation enabled the creation of separate models for each structural element.
Modeling
3D models of the bridge were developed at multiple Levels of Detail (LOD), ranging from LOD1 (basic geometry) to LOD3 (detailed geometry). Each LOD represents varying levels of precision and detail, catering to different analytical needs. At LOD1, an overview of the bridge structure is provided, while LOD2 and LOD3 offer more precise structural features.
CityGML facilitated the classification of bridge components into groups such as BridgePart, BridgeInstallation, and BridgeConstructionElement, each with specific geometric and semantic attributes. This classification supports detailed analysis and management of bridge components, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the structural and functional aspects of the bridge.
Results & Discussion
This study produced a georeferenced 3D model based on the CityGML standard, suitable for integration into 3D modeling systems and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The model includes detailed representations of bridge components classified under appropriate CityGML categories, enabling precise analysis and management.
The parametric modeling process ensured high accuracy, with the generated point clouds having a mean error of approximately 0.040873 meters. The feasibility of using CityGML for precise bridge modeling was demonstrated, as was its ability to integrate bridge data with other urban elements.
CityGML’s multiple levels of detail provide flexibility in modeling, allowing for the presentation of varying levels of detail depending on the required analysis. LOD1 depicts the basic geometry of the bridge, suitable for general visualization and preliminary assessments. LOD2 includes more detailed geometries, ideal for structural analysis and more precise visualizations. LOD3 provides highly detailed features, including specific structural elements and components, essential for in-depth engineering analyses and maintenance planning.
Conclusion
The research concludes that CityGML’s data structures are highly effective for bridge modeling, meeting the needs of 3D modeling systems and GIS applications. The developed models provide precise and detailed information about bridge structures, facilitating better management, maintenance, and analysis.
CityGML enables the integration of new bridge elements and their dynamic relationships, expanding the model’s applicability for various use cases. Future studies should focus on extending the model to include different types of bridges and developing dynamic relationships among bridge components. This will enhance the usability and robustness of the model for detailed urban analyses and provide a comprehensive tool for urban planners, engineers, and emergency responders.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Digital models
Traffic infrastructure
3D modeling
CityGML standard
Levels of detail
Points cloud
Engineering analyses
Bridges management
1- 3DCityDB, 2024, Bridge Model: 3D City Database Model, https://3dcitydb-docs.readthedocs.io/en/version-2024.0.
2- Achutan, K.; Hay, N.; Aliyari, M.; Ayele, Y.Z. A Digital Information Model Framework for UAS-Enabled Bridge Inspection. Energies 2021, 14, 6017. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196017
3- Biljecki, F., Kumar, K., & Nagel, C. (2018). CityGML Application Domain Extension (ADE): overview of developments. Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40965-018-0055-6
4- Biljecki, F., Ledoux, H., & Stoter, J. (2014). Improving the consistency of multi-LOD CityGML datasets by removing redundancy. In Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography (pp. 1–17). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12181-9_1
5- Chen, X., Chen, L., Dong, L. (2024) Reverse Model for Curved Bridge Measurement Based on 3D Laser Scanning Technology, Advances in Civil Engineering, 1(5594519), 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5594519
6- Cheng, L., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhong, L., Chen Y. & Li, M.  (2015), Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Large Multilayer Interchange Bridge Using Airborne LiDAR Data, in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 691-708, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2363463
7- Floros, G., & Dimopoulou, E. (2016). Investigating the Enrichment of a 3D City Model with various CityGML Modules. the International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences/International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/W2, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w2-3-2016
8- Giovanella, A., Bradley, P. E., & Wursthorn, S. (2019). Evaluation of topological consistency in CityGML. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-information, 8(6), 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8060278
9- Goebbels, S. (2021). 3D Reconstruction of Bridges from Airborne Laser Scanning Data and Cadastral Footprints. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-021-00076-9
10- GoogleMaps, 2024, KehiroudKenar, Mazandaran, Iran, Available from: URL
11- Gröger, G., & Plümer, L. (2012). CityGML – Interoperable semantic 3D city models. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 71, 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.04.004
12- Gröger, G., Kolbe, T. H., Czerwinski, A., & Henning, P. A. (2008). Open GIS city geography markup language (City GML) encoding standard. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258255672_Open_GIS_city_geography_markup_language_City_GML_encoding_standard
13- Gröger, G., Kolbe, T. H., Nagel, C., & Häfele, K. (2012). OGC City Geography Markup Language (CITYGML) Encoding Standard. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/OGC-City-Geography-Markup-Language-(CityGML)-Gr%C3%B6ger-Kolbe/d6d8a32f01fd2066c1fb75f705eb2e525a234ca9
14- Kasprzyk, Jean-Paul & Nys, Gilles-Antoine & Billen, Roland. (2024). Towards a multi-database CityGML environment adapted to big geodata issues of urban digital twins. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. XLVIII-4/W10-2024. 101-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W10-2024-101-2024
15- McDonnell, R., & Kemp, K. (1996). International GIS Dictionary. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470173213
16- Ohori, K. A., Biljecki, F., Kumar, K., Ledoux, H., & Stoter, J. (2018). Modeling Cities and Landscapes in 3D with CityGML. In Springer eBooks (pp. 199–215). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3_11
17- Pepe, M., Costantino, D., Alfio, V. S., Angelini, M. G., & Garofalo, A. R. (2020). A CityGML multiscale approach for the conservation and management of cultural heritage: the case study of the Old Town of Taranto (Italy). ISPRS International Journal of Geo-information, 9(7), 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070449
18- Pepe, M., Costantino, D., & Garofalo, A. R. (2020). An Efficient Pipeline to Obtain 3D Model for HBIM and Structural Analysis Purposes from 3D Point Clouds. Applied Sciences, 10(4), 1235. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10041235
19- Pepe, M., Fregonese, L., & Crocetto, N. (2019). Use of SfM-MVS approach to nadir and oblique images generated through aerial cameras to build 2.5D map and 3D models in urban areas. Geocarto International, 37(1), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1700558
20- Poku-Agyemang, K. N., & Reiterer, A. (2023). 3D Reconstruction from 2D Plans Exemplified by Bridge Structures. Remote Sensing, 15(3), 677. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030677
21- Sadidi, J., Talebzadeh, M., Rezaian, H., & Firouzabadi, P. Z. (2015). Designing 3D semantic model in LOD4 to simulate building utility network. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(16). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i16/58276
22- Salleh, S., & Ujang, U. (2018). Topological information extraction from buildings in CityGML. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 169, 012088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/169/1/012088
23- Sithole, G., Vosselman, G., Bridge detection in airborne laser scanner data, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Volume 61, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 33-46, ISSN 0924-2716, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.07.004.
24- Soergel, U., Cadario, E., Thiele, A. and Thoennessen, U., Feature Extraction and Visualization of Bridges Over Water from High-Resolution InSAR Data and One Orthophoto, in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 147-153, June 2008, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2008.2001156.
25- Tan, Y., Liang, Y., & Zhu, J. (2023). CityGML in the Integration of BIM and the GIS: Challenges and Opportunities. Buildings, 13(7), 1758. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071758
26- Traffic3D, 2024, A Rich 3D-Traffic Environment to Train Intelligent Agents, https://traffic3d.org
27- Ujang, U., Anton, F., Azri, S., Rahman, A. A., & Mioc, D. (2014). 3D Hilbert Space Filling Curves in 3D City Modeling for Faster Spatial Queries. International Journal of 3-D Information Modeling (IJ3DIM), 3(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4018/ij3dim.2014040101
28- Vissim, 2024, Multimodal Traffic Simulation Software, https://ptvGroup.com
29- Wang, R., P., J., & Chen, D. (2018). LiDAR Point Clouds to 3-D urban models$: $ a review. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 11(2), 606–627. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2017.2781132
30- Xie, X., Zhu, Q., Du, Z., Xu, W., & Zhang, Y. (2013). A semantics-constrained profiling approach to complex 3D city models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 41, 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.07.003
31- Yamane, Tatsuro & Chun, Pang-jo & Dang, Ji & Honda, Riki. (2023). Recording of bridge damage areas by 3D integration of multiple images and reduction of the variability in detected results. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. 10.1111/mice.12971. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mice.12971