فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

شناسایی پهنه های ناپایدار دامنه ای در محور ارتباطی تفین-دگاگا واقع در استان کردستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادگروه جغرافیای طبیعی وژئومورفولوژی ، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری ژئومورفولوژی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
چکیده
زمین‌لغزش یکی از مخاطرات طبیعی است که سالانه خسارات قابل توجهی به زیرساخت‌ها، منابع طبیعی، و جوامع انسانی وارد می‌کند. بسیاری از مناطق کوهستانی در کشور ایران از جمله دامنه های رشته کوه زاگرس مستعد وقوع انواع مخاطرات طبیعی و زمین لغزش هستند. بنابراین هدف از پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی مناطق مستعد وقوع زمین لغزش و ارزیابی میزان جابجایی سطح زمین با استفاده از تصاویر سنجش از دور راداری و روش تحلیل شبکه ای (ANP)در محور تفین –دگاگا واقع در استان کردستان است. داده‌های مورد استفاده در این تحقیق شامل تصاویر راداری Sentinel-1 مربوط به سال های 2021-2017 و تعداد هشت پارامتر ژئومورفولوژیکی از جمله شیب، جهت شیب، ارتفاع، فاصله از جاده، فاصله از رودخانه، کاربری اراضی، فاصله از گسل و نقشه زمین‌شناسی هستند که با استفاده از مدل تحلیل شبکه و سیستم‌های اطلاعات جغرافیایی (GIS) پردازش و تحلیل شده‌اند. بر اساس نتایج  حاصل از ارزیابی های تحلیل شبکه ای(ANP)، بیشترین کلاس آسیب پذیری خیلی زیاد به ترتیب در اراضی کشاورزی زراعی با 356.03 هکتار و سپس مسکونی با 319.75 هکتار  قرار دارد. بیشترین کلاس آسیب پذیری متوسط در کاربری کشاورزی زراعی با 5582.36 هکتار  و سپس اراضی جنگلی با 1889.64 هکتار قرار دارد. همچنین نتایج بررسی ها و مقایسه داده‌های جابجایی زمین در طول چندین بازه زمانی (از سال 2017 تا 2019) نشان‌دهنده تغییرات چشمگیر در رفتار زمین در طول جاده تفین به داگاگا است. به طوری که  میانگین جابجایی زمین در طی دوره زمانی مذکور حدود 0.05+ متر بالا آمدگی و حدود  0.08  - متر فرو افتادگی داشته است که می‌توان نتیجه گرفت نشست زمین یک روند مداوم و نگران‌کننده دارد. هرچند میانگین جابجایی در سال 2018 بهبود یافته است، اما در سال 2019 برخی نقاط دچار نشست شدیدتری شده‌اند. این داده‌ها نشان می‌دهند که منطقه همچنان در معرض خطرات ناشی از جابجایی زمین قرار دارد و اقدامات نظارتی و حفاظتی مستمر ضروری است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Identification of unstable slope zones along the Tefin-Dagaga communication axis in Kurdistan Province

نویسندگان English

Seyyed Asadallah Hejazi 1
Shahram Roostaei 1
Omid Ebrahimi 2
1 Professor of geomorphology, Faculty of geographical sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
2 PhD Student of geomorphology, Faculty of geographical sciences ,Tabriz University ,Tabriz, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Landslides are the sliding of a mass of soil or rock or a combination of them on a slope due to gravity, topographic factors, and human activities, which can occur suddenly and locally (Das et al., 2012; Kumar et al., 2017). Landslides pose serious intra-regional and extra-regional risks in mountainous regions around the world (Goetz et al., 2011), and cause serious damage to settlements, railways, power lines, roads, gas pipelines, and agricultural lands (Lin et al., 2012; Yana et al., 2016; Mousavi and Niazi, 2016). In addition, this phenomenon also causes damage by wasting large amounts of fertile soil and filling dam reservoirs downstream (Gutierrez et al., 2015). Among the areas subject to this phenomenon, Iran has always been exposed to various types of landslides due to the presence of the Alborz mountain range in the north and the Zagros mountain range in the northwest to southeast, slopes above 45 degrees, formations with sticky clay soils, and intermittent rain and snow fall, and is no exception to this issue (Rifahi, 2009).
Materials and Methods
The data used in this study include Sentinel-1 radar images from 2017-2021 (Table 1) and 8 geomorphological parameters including slope, slope direction, elevation, distance from road, distance from river, land use, distance from fault, and geological map, which were processed and analyzed using the Analysis Network Model (ANP) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Sentinel-1 images are one of the important sources of radar data for interferometric analysis (InSAR). These satellites, developed by the European Space Agency (ESA), are equipped with synthetic aperture radar (SAR) that can measure changes in the earth's surface with high accuracy. In this study, after collecting the required data and information, data analysis was carried out in three stages, each of which is described below:
Research Method
1- Evaluation of the rate of vertical displacement changes
In the interferometric analysis process (InSAR) using Sentinel-1 data, first two radar images of the study area are selected, one before and the other after the desired event (such as an earthquake or landslide). These images must overlap in time and space. Then, using the interferometric technique, the phase difference between these two images is calculated, which indicates minor changes in the height of the ground surface. Subsequently, various processes are performed such as removing atmospheric noise, smoothing the data, and converting the phase difference into accurate displacements. Finally, the results are presented in the form of displacement maps or elevation models that are used to analyze land surface changes. In this section, the results of the rate of change of land surface displacements in the study area are examined in order to evaluate and identify landslide-prone areas.
2- Potential assessment of landslide-prone areas
In this section, first, in order to prepare a landslide vulnerability map using the multi-criteria decision-making method, criteria that indicate the vulnerability of the area to landslides were used. The criteria used in this section include height, slope and slope direction, land use, distance from the river, distance from the fault, geology, and distance from the road. In this stage, the relationships between the criteria were determined using the EDPSIR method, and then the weight of each criterion was determined using the Analytical Network Process (ANP) method through expert opinion (questionnaire). Finally, after fuzzing the layers, by combining them in the Geographic Information System (GIS) environment based on the weight of each criterion, a landslide vulnerability map was produced at the level of the study area.
3- Final analysis of the results of the method
After evaluating the changes in ground surface displacements and identifying areas prone to landslides, the hazardous zones in the study area were finally identified. For this purpose, first, images with an appropriate time interval from the landslide event were selected to accurately record and analyze the ground surface displacements. For example, for the image of July 22, 2018 in the area, the previous image was recorded on July 4, 2018 and the next image was recorded on August 2, 2018. This 18 to 20-day interval between images is a good choice for accurate analysis of ground surface changes. Considering the strength of the earthquake and weather conditions, these images can provide appropriate data for investigating landslides. Finally, a landslide hazard zoning map was prepared using five hazard classes (very low, low, medium, high, and very high). Different colors on the map represent the level of landslide hazard in each part of the area. This map helps identify areas prone to landslides and is of great importance for environmental risk management and urban and rural planning. The map is produced based on network analysis models and environmental data, and the percentage of areas under different risks is well defined.
Discussion and Results
According to the objectives of this study, first the amount of vertical displacements in the study area has been investigated. Then the landslide-prone areas have been identified and evaluated, which are described below:
1- Evaluation of the amount of vertical displacement changes
2- Evaluation of landslide-prone areas
3- Analysis of results
Figure (12) shows the map of landslide-prone areas using five risk classes (very low, low, medium, high and very high). Different colors on the map represent the level of landslide risk in each part of the area. This map helps identify landslide-prone areas and is of great importance for environmental risk management and urban and rural planning. The map was generated based on analytical models and environmental data, and the percentage of areas at different risk is well defined. Very low (23.95%): This class, with 195,567 pixels, covers about 3055.73 hectares of the area, which is approximately 24% of the total area. These areas have the lowest risk of landslides and are usually located in areas with low slopes and away from faults. Low (21.06%): This class, with 171,939 pixels, covers about 2686.55 hectares of the area, which is 21% of the total area.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Landslide prone areas
Radar images
Analysis network
Vertical displacement
1- Abdul Rachman Rasyid1,2*, Netra P. Bhandary1 and Ryuichi Yatabe1(2016), Performance of frequency ratio and logistic regression model in creating GIS based landslides susceptibility map at Lompobattang Mountain, Indonesia, Rasyid et al. Geoenvironmental Disasters (2016) 3:19 DOI 10.1186/s40677-016
2- Akbari Sahar; Amir Saffari. (2017), Landslide susceptibility estimation using logistic regression model and entropy index, case study (Dalaho County elevations), Journal of Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards, Year 6, Issue 2, Summer 2019, pages 165 to 180
3- Ameri, Alireza Arab; Shirani, Koorosh; & Halabian; Amir Hossin. (2016). Predictive Evaluation of Statistical and Logistic Models for Landslide Hazard Zoning Mapping (Case Study: Vanak Basin)Physical Geography, 9(32), 123–140. Kamakpanah, Ali; Montazer-e-Qaem, Saeed and Jafar Chadani (1994), Landslide Zoning in Iran, Landslides and a Review of Landslides in Iran, (Volume One) International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 65 pages.
4- Aykut Akgun; Necdet Turk, 2010. Landslide susceptibility mapping for Ayvalik (Western Turkey) and its vicinity by multicriteria decision analysis. Environmental Earth Science 61: 5
5- Beheshtifara Sara *, Abdolzadea Farshad)2019), Examining Landslide Hazard Zonation in Ispiran, East Azerbaijan Province Using Logistic Regression Model and GIS, Geography and Environmental Hazards 30 )2019)
6- Ercanoglu Murat, Dağdelenler Gülseren Özsayin, Erman, Alkevlı Tolga, Sönmez Harun, N. Nur Özyurt, Kahraman Burcu, Uçar İbrahim & Çetınkaya  Sinem 2012. New approach to use AHP in landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study at Yenice (Karabuk, NW Turkey). Natural Hazards 63(2): 1157-1179, doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0218-1 Application of Chebyshev theorem to data preparation in landslide susceptibility mapping studies: an example from Yenice (Karabük, Turkey) region
7- European Space Agency website (https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu)
8- Ghasemian Bahareh; Shahabi Himan; Shirzadi Ataollah; Al-Ansari Nadhir; Abolfazl Jaafari; Victoria Kress; Marten Geertsema; Renoud Somayeh. and Ahmad, Anuar. (2022). A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran. Sensors, 22(1573): 1-28.
9- Hemmati, Fariba; Seyyed Asdallah Hijazi. (2016), Landslide hazard zoning using logistic regression statistical method in Lavasanat watershed, Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, Year 17, No. 45, Summer 2017
10- Hidayat1, H Pachri1, and I Alimuddin (2019), Analysis of Landslide Susceptibility Zone using Frequency Ratio and Logistic Regression Method in Hambalang, Citeureup District, Bogor Regency, West Java Province, The 4th International Conference of Indonesian Society for Remote Sensing IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 280 (2019) 012005
11- Huangfu 1, Weicheng Wu 1,* , Xiaoting Zhou 1 , Ziyu Lin 1 , Guiliang Zhang 2 , Renxiang Chen 2 , Yong Song 2 , Tao Lang 2 , Yaozu Qin 1 , Penghui Ou 1 , Xiaofeng Zhang 3 , Xiangtong Liu 4 and Wenheng Liu 1(2021), Landslide Geo-Hazard Risk Mapping Using Logistic Regression Modeling in Guixi, Jiangxi, China, Sustainability 2021, 13, 4830
12- Kamakpanah, Ali; Montazer-e-Qaem, Saeed and Jafar Chadani (1994), Landslide Zoning in Iran, Landslides and a Review of Landslides in Iran, (Volume One) International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 65 pages.
13- Lee, E.M., Jones, D.K.C., (2004) Landslide risk assessment. Thomas Telford, London, p 454
14- Lombardoa Luigi, b, ⁎, P. Martin Maib (2018) Presenting logistic regression-based landslide susceptibility results, Engineering Geology
15- Moradi, Hamid Reza ; Maryam Dashti Mervili; Alireza Ildarmi. (2014) Preparing a landslide hazard sensitivity map and its evaluation using logistic regression statistical analysis, Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, Volume 67, Number 4, Winter 2014
16- Motavali, Sadredin., Esmaili, Reza., Hosseinzadeh, Moohamad Mehdi (2009), The Signification of Sensitive Regions in the Vaz Catchment by Logistic Regression, Journal of Physiography, Volume 2, Number 5, Autumn, PP. 73-83. 
17- Nasiri, Shahram ;. Mohsen Ehteshami-Moinabadi (2004) A perspective on landslides in Iran (Case study: Slope instability on Haraz road, National Geosciences Database, page 1.
18- Pourghasemi, HamidReza., Pradhan Biswajeet., and Gokceoglu Cokceoglu (2012) Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Natural Hazards 63: 965–996. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0217-2.
19- Roostaei, Shahram; Davod Mokhtari;Christineh Jananeh . (2019) Quantitative analysis of slope instabilities on slopes overlooking the Tehran-North highway using logistic regression, Journal of Geography and Planning, No. 80, Summer Season, 1401, pages 159-169
20- Roostaei Shahram. (2004), Evaluation of Landslide Occurrence in Nasir Abad Village Varzeqan (Province of East Azarbayjan) by Using Quantitative Methods, Journal of Humanity, Vol. 8, No. 1: PP. 45.06
21- Sayyad Asghari Saraskanroud, Fahimeh Pourfarashzadeh (2021) Evaluation and zoning of landslide characteristics using statistical methods in the Balikhli watershed . Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, Year 11, Issue 42, Summer 1401, pp. 41-59
22- Sharafat Chowdhury a,b,* , Md. Naimur Rahman a , Md. Sujon Sheikh a , Md. Abu Sayeid a , Khandakar Hasan Mahmud a , Bibi Hafsa a)2024), GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using logistic regression, random forest and decision and regression tree models in Chattogram District, Bangladesh, journal homepage.
23- Shirani, Kourosh and Alireza Arab Ameri (2015), Landslide Zoning Using Logistic Regression Method (Dzaalia Basin), Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies and Natural Resources, Soil and Water Sciences/Year 19/ Issue 27.
24- Tee Xiong, I Gde Budi Indrawn*, and Doni Prakasa Eka Putra (2017), Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Analytical Hierarchy Process, Statistical Index, Index of Enthropy, and Logistic Regression Approaches in the Tinalah Watershed, Yogyakarta. Journal of Applied Geology, vol. (1), 2017, pp. 78–93
25- Wu, W.; Ai, G. Risk assessment of natural disasters in the course of selection of nuclear waste disposal. J. East China Geol. Inst. 1995, 18, 260–265. (In Chinese with English abstract).