فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

ارزیابی مقایسه‌ای کارآیی عملگر‌های فازی پردازش شئ‌گرای تصاویر ماهواره‌ای در پایش تغییرات پوشش‌گیاهی حوضه آبریز کرخه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری آب و هواشناسی، دانشگاه لرستان، لرستان، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه جغرافیا،دانشگاه لرستان، لرستان، ایران
3 دانشیارگروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
4 دانشیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه لرستان، لرستان، ایران
چکیده
پوشش‌گیاهی شاخص سلامت اکوسیستم است و نقش مهمی در حفظ تعادل اکولوژیکی، تنظیم چرخه آب و تسهیل جریان ماده و انرژی دارد. پویایی پوشش‌گیاهی ناشی از تنش‌های محیطی و فعالیت‌های انسانی در حال تسریع است و نیاز به پایش و نظارت طولانی مدت مداوم دارد. با توسعه فناوری سنجش از دور، تصاویر سنجش از دور به طور گسترده در کار بررسی پوشش‌گیاهی مورد استفاده قرار گرفته است. هدف از این پژوهش، ارزیابی مقایسه‌ای کارآیی عملگر‌های فازی پردازش شئ‌گرای تصاویر ماهواره‌ای در پایش تغییرات پوشش‌گیاهی حوضه آبریز کرخه با استفاده از سری زمانی تصاویر ماهواره لندست است. در راستای این هدف، پس از تهیه تصاویر سری زمانی سال‌های 1373، 1378، 1383، 1388، 1393، 1398 و 1403 از سامانه گوگل‌ارث انجین، با استفاده از رویکرد پردازش شئ‌گرای تصاویر ماهواره‌ای و عملگر‌های AND، OR، MGE، MAR، MGWE و ALP اقدام به قطعه‌بندی و طبقه‌بندی تصاویر شد. مرحله قطعه‌بندی، با استفاده از مقیاس، ضریب شکل و ضریب فشردگی بهینه انجام شد و پس از آن دو کلاس پوشش‌گیاهی و غیر پوشش‌گیاهی ساخته شد و نمونه‌های تعلیماتی نیز انتخاب شدند. در مرحله بعد طبقه‌بندی انجام گرفت و برای تعیین دقّت طبقه‌بندی، با استفاده از نقاط کنترل واقعیت زمینی انتخابی، دقّت کلی و ضریب کاپا برای نقشه‌های تولیدی محاسبه شدند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که عملگر فازی AND با دقت ۹۷/۳۸ درصد و ضریب کاپای ۰/۹۸۱۸ بهترین عملکرد را در پایش پوشش‌گیاهی حوضه کرخه دارد. تحلیل سری زمانی تصاویر لندست طی ۳۰ سال گذشته کاهش حدود ۱۸ درصدی پوشش‌گیاهی را آشکار کرد. این روند که ناشی از عوامل انسانی و طبیعی است، تهدیدی جدی برای پایداری اکولوژیکی و جوامع محلی محسوب می‌شود و ضرورت اتخاذ سیاست‌های جامع حفاظت و احیای پوشش‌گیاهی را برجسته می‌نماید.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of fuzzy operators of Object-Based processing of satellite images in monitoring vegetation changes in the Karkheh watershed

نویسندگان English

Seyed Akbar Hosseini 1
Mostafa Karampour 2
Amir Hossin Halabian 3
Behruz Nasiri 4
1 PhD student in Meteorology, Lorestan University, Lorestan, Iran
2 Associate professor, Department of geography, Lorestan University, Lorestan, Iran
3 Associate professor, Department of geography, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate professor, Department of geography, Lorestan University, Lorestan, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract:
Introduction:
  Vegetation is an indicator of ecosystem health and plays an important role in maintaining ecological balance, regulating the water cycle, and facilitating the flow of matter and energy. The dynamics of vegetation caused by environmental stresses and human activities are increasing and require continuous long-term monitoring and surveillance. With the development of remote sensing technology, remote sensing images have been widely used in vegetation survey work.
Materials & Methods:
  In this study, multispectral images from the Landsat satellite were used, including time series from 1994 (Landsat 5), 1999 (Landsat 5), 2004 (Landsat 5), 2009 (Landsat 7), 2014 (Landsat 8), 2019 (Landsat 8), and 2024 (Landsat 8). After obtaining the desired time series images from the Google Earth Engine system, the desired images were called in the ENVI 5.6 software environment and cropped using the shapefile of the study area. Then, the desired images were saved in TIFF format. Pre-processing operations, including radiometric and atmospheric corrections, were performed on all images. eCognition software was used for segmentation and also classification based on object-oriented fuzzy operators. In order to perform object-oriented processing of images, image segmentation was performed at this stage. In the segmentation stage, satellite images were segmented based on different scales, shape factors, and compression factors to achieve the optimal scale, shape factors, and compression factors, and after achieving the optimal segmentation conditions, two classes were created under the title of vegetation cover and non-vegetation cover. Subsequently, the training points required for each class were determined to train the algorithm used. Then, using fuzzy operators, including AND, OR, MGE, MAR, MGWE, and ALP, the classification process was performed based on object-oriented processing of satellite images.
Results & Discussion
  With the aim of producing image objects, the segmentation process was performed at different scales, shape factors and compression factors to achieve optimal segmentation. At this stage, the multi-resolution segmentation method was used for image segmentation. The most optimal segmentation included a scale of 40, a shape factor of 0.3 and a compression factor of 0.7. Because at scales higher than 40, the creation of image objects was not performed well. After the segmentation and generation of image objects were completed, two classes of vegetation cover and non-vegetation cover were created, and a number of image objects produced in the segmentation stage were selected as training points and a number were selected as ground reality points. At this stage, classification was performed based on the nearest neighbor algorithm and by selecting parameters such as mean, standard deviation, skewness, and texture for each band.
Conclusion:
  The results showed that the fuzzy AND operator, with an overall accuracy of 97.38% and a kappa coefficient of 0.9818, performed best in monitoring vegetation cover in the Karkheh watershed. A 30-year Landsat time series analysis revealed an approximately 18% decline in vegetation cover. This trend, driven by both human and natural factors, poses a serious threat to ecological sustainability and local communities, highlighting the urgent need for comprehensive policies on vegetation protection and restoration.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Remote sensing
Fuzzy
Object Based
Monitoring
Karkheh
1- Ali, A., Dunlop, P., Coleman, S., Kerr, D., McNabb, R. W., & Noormets, R. (2023). Glacier area changes in Novaya Zemlya from 1986–89 to 2019–21 using object-based image analysis in Google Earth Engine. Journal of Glaciology, 69(277), 1305-1316. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2023.18
2- Brink, A. B., & Eva, H. D. (2009). Monitoring 25 years of land cover change dynamics in Africa: A sample based remote sensing approach. Applied Geography, 29(4), 501-512. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.10.004
3- Cao, Q., Li, M., Yang, G., Tao, Q., Luo, Y., Wang, R., & Chen, P. (2024). Urban Vegetation Classification for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing Combining Feature Engineering and Improved DeepLabV3+. Forests, 15(2), 382. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/15/2/382
4- de Oliveira, S. M., Beltrão, N. E. S., Machado, F. F., & Lima, I. F. (2024). Monitoring Vegetation Cover in mining areas in the municipality of Ipixuna do Pará (PA). Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-3-2024, 115-120. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-3-2024-115-2024
5- Feizizadeh, B. (2018). A Novel Approach of Fuzzy DempsterShafer Theory for Spatial Uncertainty Analysis and Accuracy Assessment of Object-Based Image Classification. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 15(1), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2017.2763979
6- Feizizadeh, B., Blaschke, T., Tiede, D., & Moghaddam, M. H. R. (2017). Evaluating fuzzy operators of an object-based image analysis for detecting landslides and their changes. Geomorphology, 293, 240-254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.06.002
7- Hartoni, Siregar, V., Wouthuyzen, S., & Agus, S. (2022). Object based classification of benthic habitat using Sentinel 2 imagery by applying with support vector machine and random forest algorithms in shallow waters of Kepulauan Seribu, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 23. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230155
8- Hussain, S., Qin, S., Nasim, W., Bukhari, M. A., Mubeen, M., Fahad, S., Raza, A., Abdo, H. G., Tariq, A., Mousa, B. G., Mumtaz, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Monitoring the Dynamic Changes in Vegetation Cover Using Spatio-Temporal Remote Sensing Data from 1984 to 2020. Atmosphere, 13(10), 1609. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/10/1609
9- Kang, Y., Guo, E., Wang, Y., Bao, Y., Bao, Y., & Mandula, N. (2021). Monitoring Vegetation Change and Its Potential Drivers in Inner Mongolia from 2000 to 2019. Remote Sensing, 13(17), 3357. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/17/3357
10- Kazemi Garajeh, M., Feizizadeh, B., Weng, Q., Rezaei Moghaddam, M. H., & Kazemi Garajeh, A. (2022). Desert landform detection and mapping using a semi-automated object-based image analysis approach. Journal of Arid Environments, 199, 104721. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2022.104721
11- Mousapour, M., Feizizadeh, B., Hosseini, S. A., Karchi, H., & Seifi, A. (2020). Comparison of the performance of artificial neural network, support vector machine and object-oriented model in monitoring snow cover changes using multi-temporal Landsat images (Case study: Alvand mountain range). Climatology Researches, (39), 105-121. In Persian.
12- Mousapour, M., Kafash Charandabi, N., & Khorrami, H. (2025). Comparison of the efficiency of kernel functions of pixel-based support vector machine and object-oriented fuzzy operators in monitoring Tabriz urban growth and expansion changes. Journal of Remote Sensing & GIS Applications in Environmental Sciences, 5(14), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22034/rsgi.2025.63373.1098 .In Persian.
13- Najafi, P., Navid, H., Feizizadeh, B., Eskandari, I., & Blaschke, T. (2019). Fuzzy Object-Based Image Analysis Methods Using Sentinel-2A and Landsat-8 Data to Map and Characterize Soil Surface Residue. Remote Sensing, 11(21), 2583. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/21/2583
14- Norris, G. S., LaRocque, A., Leblon, B., Barbeau, M. A., & Hanson, A. R. (2024). Comparing Pixel- and Object-Based Approaches for Classifying Multispectral Drone Imagery of a Salt Marsh Restoration and Reference Site. Remote Sensing, 16(6), 1049. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/6/1049
15- Pradhan, B., Yoon, S., & Lee, S. (2024). Examining the Dynamics of Vegetation in South Korea: An Integrated Analysis Using Remote Sensing and In Situ Data. Remote Sensing, 16(2), 300. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/2/300
16- Rezaei Moghaddam, M. H., Mohammadzadeh, K., & Pishnamaz Ahmadi, M. (2020). Investigating and comparing object-oriented algorithms used for extraction of water bodies from sentinel imagery. Sepehr, 29(115), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2020.47878 .In Persian.
17- Sadian, A., & Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H. (2021). Investigation of land use changes in Karkheh watershed during 1990 and 2020 using Google Earth Engine platform and Landsat satellite images. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 52(10), 2569-2580. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2021.330075.669068 .In Persian.
18- Safari, S., Sadeghian, M. S., Haji-Kandi, H., & Mahdi Zadeh, S. S. (2023). Evaluation of soft computing models in regional flood hydrological homogenization (Case study: Karkheh watershed). Water and Irrigation Management, 13(3), 817-835. https://doi.org/10.22059/jwim.2023.354624.1054 .In Persian.
19- Uça Avcı, Z., Karaman, M., Ozelkan, E., & Papila, I. (2011). A Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods, A Case Study: Istanbul, Turkey.
20- Vu Viet Du, Q., Minh Pham, T., Manh Pham, V., Duy Nguyen, H., Huy Nguyen, Q., Thanh Pham, V., & Cao Nguyen, H. (2024). An experimental comparison of pixel-based and object-based classifications with different machine learning algorithms in landscape pattern analysis Case study from Quang Ngai city, Vietnam. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1345(1), 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1345/1/012019
21- Wang, Z., Wei, C., Liu, X., Zhu, L., Yang, Q., Wang, Q., Zhang, Q., & Meng, Y. (2022). Object-based change detection for vegetation disturbance and recovery using Landsat time series. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 59(1), 1706-1721. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2022.2129870
22- Yilmaz, E. O., Kavzoglu, T., Colkesen, I., Tonbul, H., & Teke, A. (2024). Methodology For Extracting Poplar Planted Fields From Very High-Resolution Imagery Using Object-Based Image Analysis and Feature Selection Strategy. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 10, 259-265.
23- Zhang, J., Yang, Z., Zheng, S., & Yue, H. (2024). Dynamic monitoring of vegetation growth in Engebei ecological demonstration area based on remote sensing. Environmental Earth Sciences, 83(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11371-7
24- Zhao, C., Pan, Y., Ren, S., Gao, Y., Wu, H., & Ma, G. (2024). Accurate vegetation destruction detection using remote sensing imagery based on the three-band difference vegetation index (TBDVI) and dual-temporal detection method. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 127, 103669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.103669
25- Zhao, X., Jing, L., Zhang, G., Zhu, Z., Liu, H., & Ren, S. (2024). Object-Oriented Convolutional Neural Network for Forest Stand Classification Based on Multi-Source Data Collaboration. Forests, 15(3), 529. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/15/3/529