فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

شناسایی نواحی مستعد توسعه گردشگری مبتنی بر طبیعت در شهرستان خمینی‌شهر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد اکوتوریسم، گروه جغرافیا و گردشگری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و علوم زمین، دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و گردشگری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و علوم زمین، دانشگاه کاشان، کاشان، ایران
چکیده
در برنامه‌های توسعه گردشگری، شناسایی و پهنه‌بندی مناطق مستعد، نقش محوری در موفقیت و پایداری ایفا می‌کند. در این راستا، پژوهش حاضر قصد دارد با استفاده از روش تحلیل آمایشی داده‌های مکانی در سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی، پهنه‌های مناسب توسعه گردشگری مبتنی بر طبیعت در شهرستان خمینی‌شهر را شناسایی کند. این پژوهش بر اساس هدف کاربردی، بر اساس ماهیت داده‌ کمّی، بر اساس روش تحقیق آمایشی و تحلیلی، بر اساس زمان انجام مقطعی و بر اساس شیوۀ جمع‌آوری داده‌ها میدانی و مکانی است. به این منظور، داده‌های مکانی زیرمعیارهای فاصله از منطقه حفاظت‌شده قمیشلو، فاصله و تراکم شبکه راه‌ها، فاصله و تراکم مراکز جمعیتی، ارتفاع و شیب زمین جمع‌آوری و لایه‌های رقومی آنها در نرم‌افزار ArcGIS تهیه شد. سپس با مقایسه زوجی عوامل، ارجحیت آنها براساس نظرات کارشناسی استخراج شد. نهایتاً لایه‌های رقومی با توجه به وزن هر عامل ترکیب و نقشه قابلیت اراضی پتانسیل گردشگری مبتنی بر طبیعت ایجاد شد. نتایج نشان داد 13.11 درصد (2291 هکتار) از مساحت شهرستان خمینی‌شهر به‌عنوان پهنه بسیار مناسب، عمدتاً در شمال و شمال‌غرب قرار دارد. پهنه مناسب 23 درصد (4016 هکتار) از مساحت را در اطراف پهنه بسیارمناسب به خود اختصاص داد. پهنه متوسط با 30.82 درصد (5385 هکتار) از مساحت شهرستان در اکثر نواحی، به جز جنوب و مرزها، پراکندگی دارد. پهنه نامناسب با 23.67 درصد (4137 هکتار) وسعت، بیشتر در نوار مرزی و پهنه بسیار نامناسب با 9.42 درصد (1646 هکتار) وسعت در جنوب و جنوب‌شرق گستردگی دارند. این پهنه‌ها، امکان شناسایی نواحی با بیشترین پتانسیل گردشگری پایدار برای بهره‌برداری، سرمایه‌گذاری و توسعۀ زیرساخت‌ها را فراهم می‌آورند. همچنین به تصمیم‌گیران و برنامه‌ریزان کمک می‌کنند تا با اتخاذ رویکردی هدفمند، به توسعۀ توریسم در مناطق دارای قابلیت‌های طبیعی منحصربه‌فرد بپردازند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Identification of areas susceptible to nature-based tourism development in Khomeini Shahr County

نویسندگان English

Narges Aminizadeh 1
Sayyed Hojjat Mousavi 2
1 M.A. Graduate of ecotourism, Department of geography and tourism, Faculty of natural resources and earth sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran
2 Associate professor, Department of geography and tourism, Faculty of natural resources and earth sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Introduction

Nature-based tourism plays an important role in protecting the environment, increasing environmental awareness, and improving the economy of local communities. This type of tourism, by emphasizing the preservation of natural and cultural heritage, provides an opportunity for sustainable development. Nature-based tourism not only preserves natural and cultural resources, but can also have a positive impact on job creation, increasing the income of local communities, and promoting environmental awareness. Ecotourism, in line with ecological principles and laws, involves visiting natural areas for the purpose of learning, studying, or carrying out environmentally friendly activities. The development of nature-based tourism requires careful planning and understanding of regional capacities to prevent potential damage to the environment and local communities. Tourism development refers to the process of its growth and expansion in an area that can improve the economy and lives of local people. The issue of sustainability also becomes more important when prioritizing among the various susceptible areas and revisiting less susceptible or vulnerable areas in later priorities. Khomeini Shahr County, due to its geographical location, natural landscapes, biodiversity, cultural-historical attractions, rich local culture, and proximity to Isfahan city, has high potential for the development of nature-based tourism. This county, whose tourism capabilities have been hidden under the shadow of urbanization due to the growth of technology and industry, needs to re-identify its neglected nature-based tourism phenomena. Therefore, the present study, taking into account these principles, has identified suitable areas for the development of nature-based tourism with a systemic perspective and a comprehensive approach. The results of this study can be used in formulating tourism development programs for the county, protecting the environment, and improving the economic situation of the region.

Material and Methods

Khomeini Shahr County, with an area of 184 square kilometers, is located in central part of Isfahan Province, bordered by Shahin Shahr and Meymeh County to north, Falavarjan County to south, Isfahan County to east, and Najafabad County to west. This county is located at a geographical location of 51 degrees and 24 minutes to 51 degrees and 36 minutes east longitude and 32 degrees and 35 minutes to 32 degrees and 47 minutes north latitude.

present study is based on spatial analysis of spatial data using geographic technologies, which is based on purpose of "applied", based on nature of data "quantitative", based on research method "analytical and statistical", based on time of implementation "cross-sectional", and based on method of data collection "field and spatial". To conduct research, first, based on comparative studies and theoretical research literature, criteria and sub-criteria affecting zoning of areas prone to nature tourism were determined and categorized into main groups. Data collection was carried out in a spatial-spatial and analytical manner through basic data such as base maps, digital elevation models, Google Earth satellite images, and data archives of relevant institutions. digital layers of above-mentioned criteria were carried out through densitometry and distance measurement functions. Data analysis was carried out based on analytical principles and spatial-spatial analysis functions in ArcGIS and Google Earth software environments.

Results and Discussion

Results of distance measurement from Qamishloo protected area showed northern and northwestern parts of county have shortest distance and southern and southeastern areas have maximum distance of up to 19,510 meters. Results of distance from communication roads of Khomein Shahr showed longest distance from road network is up to 5,470 meters, which is observed in northern and northwestern parts of region. Results of roads density showed that highest density of communication network, 0.6854 kilometers per hectare, is observed in central areas and parts of northern and southern areas. Results of distance measurement from population centers showed longest distance to residential centers, 5,320 meters, is observed in north, northwest, and parts of county center. Results of residential centers density showed highest density of 0.02281 settlements per hectare was located in central and southern parts, and with increasing distance in northwestern areas, natural phenomena prevailed. Results of altitude factor assessment showed highest altitude above sea level, 2495 meters, was located in northern parts of the region. Also, central and southern parts of Khomeini Shahr, with a minimum altitude of 1572 meters above sea level, are suitable places for ecotourism development in Khomeini Shahr in terms of altitude factor. Slope class map showed northern parts of County had highest slope of 66.79 degrees. Also, central and southern parts of County had a minimum slope of less than 239.5 degrees, which makes these areas susceptible to ecotourism development.

Conclusion

In this study, by identifying and weighting key factors affecting development of ecotourism based on principles of spatial analysis, Khomeini Shahr County was divided into zones suitable for ecotourism from very unsuitable to very suitable. These zones allow identification of areas with highest potential for investment and development of sustainable ecotourism infrastructure and help decision-makers and planners to adopt a targeted approach to developing tourism in areas with unique natural capabilities. very suitable zone covers 13.11% (equivalent to 2291 hectares) of county area, mainly in north and northwest of Khomeini Shahr City. suitable zone constitutes 23% (equivalent to 4016 hectares) of county area around very suitable zone. Most of county area is in medium category in terms of ecotourism. This zone covers 30.82% (equivalent to 5385 hectares) of county area, almost in most areas except south and border areas of county. unsuitable zone covers 23.67% (equivalent to 4137 hectares) of county area, mainly on edge of border strip. highly unsuitable zone covers 9.42% (equivalent to 1646 hectares) of county area, especially in south and southeast. results of this research provide a suitable basis for informed and strategic decisions in field of responsible nature tourism activities and sustainable investments. Using these results, decision-makers and planners will be able to identify areas with high potential for ecotourism development and develop appropriate and sustainable development plans, taking into account ecological capacities and socio-economic indicators of each region. This data-based approach will ensure long-term success of investments and optimize positive impacts of tourism on local communities and environmental protection.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Geographic data
Spatial analysis
Land capability
Potential tourism areas
Khomeini Shahr
1- Abrehe, S., Girma, A., & Nigusse, A. G. (2021). Potential ecotourism site suitability evaluation for sustainable natural resource management in Kafta Sheraro National Park (KSNP), north-western Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Ecotourism, 20(4), 341-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2021.1897599
2- Aliani, H., Babaie Kafaky, S., Saffari, A., & Monavari, S. M. (2017). Land capability assessment to determine suitable tourism area using analytical network process (ANP). Journal of Remote Sensing (RS) and Geographic Information System (GIS) for Natural Resources, 7(4), 1-17. https://journals.iau.ir/article_528878.html [In Persian]
3- Amin, G., Haroon, E., Imtiaz, I., Saqib, N. U., & Shahzad, M. I. (2021). Ecotourism potential assessment for Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan using integration of GIS, remote sensing, AHP and crowd-sourced data. Geocarto International, 37(25), 8724–8745. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.2005157
4- Anabestani, A.A., Noori Zamanabadi, H., & Mollanorozi, M. (2020). Ecological capability evaluation with the aim of developing sustainable rural tourism using WLC and Fuzzy methods in GIS environment - Case study: Neyshabur County. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), 29(115), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.22131/sepehr.2020.47887 [In Persian]
5- Asrari, E., & Masoudi, M. (2016). Zoning of the apt area for tourism and ecotourism development in Fars Province. Journal of Human and Environment, 14(3), 1-11. https://sanad.iau.ir/en/Journal/he/Article/848205 [In Persian]
6- Bazm-Ara-Balashti, M., Tavakkoli, M., & Jafarzadeh, K. (2017). Assessing Appropriate Areas for Ecotourism Development of Protected Areas, Case Study: Khaeez Protected Area. The Journal of Spatial Planning and Geomatics, 21(3), 95-118. https://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-21-4518-fa.html [In Persian]
7- Bernini, C., Cracolici, M. F., & Nijkamp, P. (2016). Place-Based Attributes and Spatial Expenditure Behavior in Tourism. Journal of Regional Science, 57(2), 218–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12308
8- Dolma Eco-Tourism. (2018). Ecotourism as a tool for sustainable community development. Dolma Foundation. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ecotourism-tool-sustainable-community-development-dolma-eco-tourism
9- Eboy, O.V. (2017). Tourism mapping: an overview of cartography and the use of GIS. Bimp-Eaga. Journal for Sustainable Tourism Development, 6(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.51200/bimpeagajtsd.v6i1.3068
10- Fennell, D., & Weaver, D.B. (2005). The ecotourium concept and tourism-conservation symbiosis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 13(4), 373-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09669580508668563
11- Garedew, K.F. (2020). Identification of potential eco-tourism site suitability using AHP and GIS in Dinsho District of Bale Zone, Southeastern Ethiopia. Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Sports, 52, 16-27. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JTHS/article/view/55054
12- Gearing, C. E., & Var, T. (1977). Site selection problem in touristic feasibility reports. The Tourist Review, 32(2), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb057745
13- Ghorbannia, V., Mirsanjari, M., & Liaghati, H. (2018). Evaluating ecotourism potential development in Dena County using multi-criteria evaluation of specific hybrid indices. Journal of Rangeland, 12(3), 316-328. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20080891.1397.12.3.6.4 [In Persian]
14- Honey, M. (2008). Ecotourism and sustainable development: Who Owns Paradise?. London: Island Press, Second Edition.
15- Hooper, J. (2015). A destination too far? Modelling destination accessibility and distance decay in tourism. Geo Journal, 80(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9536-z
16- Islam, Z., & Alam, M. A. (2013). Application of GIS in the Development of Ecotourism in Nainital City Uttarakhand. Asia-Pacific Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 125-132. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334783616
17- Kai-lian, M. (2016). Study on resort site selection. Journal of Sichuan Tourism University, 167710941 https://semanticscholar.org/paper/5287ce012ef50f177f4f0743b36a6bd5b159d997
18- Khodaian, S., Fekrizad, N., & Arastoo, B. (2014). Feasibility study of Ecotourism Regions in Talesh County Using GIS. Physical Geography Research, 46(90), 477-494. https://doi.org/10.22059/jphgr.2014.52998 [In Persian]
19- Kiper, T. (2013). Role of Ecotourism in Sustainable Development. In: Advances in Landscape Architecture. London: IntechOpen, 773-802. https://doi.org/10.5772/55749
20- Makhdoum, M. (2012). Fundamental of Land Use Planning. Tehran: University of Tehran Press, 12th Edition. [In Persian]
21- Mansour, S., Al-Awhadi, T., & Al-Hatrushi, S. (2020). Geospatial based multi-criteria analysis for ecotourism land suitability using GIS & AHP: A case study of Masirah Island, Oman. Journal of Ecotourism, 19(2), 148-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2019.1663202
22- Mousavi, S.H. (2023). Evaluating the Ecological Potential of Tourism Development Using the Spatial Analysis of Suitable Zones for Ecotourism: A Case Study of Kashan City. Journal of Desert Ecosystem Engineering, 11(37), 27-42. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25386336.1401.11.37.3.7 [In Persian]
23- Mousavi, S.H., Abbasian, A., & Zormand, P. (2017). Evaluation of Ecological Potential of Ecotourism Development on Extensive and Focused Outing in Shahreza. Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences, 17(46), 119-138. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22287736.1396.17.46.8.8 [In Persian]
24- Moutinho, L., & Paton, R. (2015). Site selection analysis in tourism: selected findings. Part of the book series: Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science (DMSPAMS), 560–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17055-8_114
25- Nyaupane, G. P., Morais, D. B., & Dowler, L. (2006). The role of community involvement and number/type of visitors on tourism impacts: A controlled comparison of Annapurna, Nepal and Northwest Yunnan, China. Tourism Management, 27(6), 1373–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.12.013
26- Oliani, L.G.N., Rossi, G.B., & Gervasoni, V. C. (2011). What are the attractiveness factors that influence the choice of a tourist destination, A study of Brazilian Tourist Consumer. Chinese Business Review, 10(4), 286-293. https://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1506%2F2011.04.005
27- Othman, A.N., Salim, P.M., Khalid, N., Munsai, A., & Salleh, S.A. (2022). GIS based Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) for ecotourism site suitability in South Kelantan, Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1019, 012037. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315%2F1019%2F1%2F012037
28- Patel, J. K., & Anuragi, R. B. (2024). Identifying the ecotourism potential locations using AHP and Weighted Overlay Analysis: A case of Bundelkhand region in Central India. Papers in Applied Geography, 10(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2023.2254786
29- Qun-chao, R. (2002). On the influential factors in the site-choosing of tourism projects. Journal of Chongqing Teachers College, 167422077. https://semanticscholar.org/ paper/437957a368a0cb0db333d22be31963a4ada2527a
30- Ramezanipour, M., Roshani, M., & Pourramazan, E. (2011). Assessment suitable Ecotourism place by Geography Information System Technical (Case study: Deylaman zone). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 6(16), 70-83. https://sanad.iau.ir/en/Journal/jshsp/Article/1032653 [In Persian]
31- Ridwana, R., & Himayah, S. (2020). Utilization of Remote Sensing Technology and Geographic Information System for tourism development. International Journal of Applied Sciences in Tourism and Events, 4(2), 158-169. https://dx.doi.org/10.31940/ijaste.v4i2.2042
32- Rifki, M. S., Rahmafitria, F., & Sugito, N. T. (2019). Tourism component evaluation: GIS based analysis towards the qualification of destination planning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 259, 121-124. https://doi.org/10.2991/isot-18.2019.25
33- Roy, D., Kundu, P., Paul, S., & Sarkar, B. C. (2024). Potential suitability mapping evaluation for ecotourism development in Darjeeling Himalayan region of IndiaJournal of Ecotourism, 23(3), 414–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/14724049.2023.2272059
34- Singh, P. (2015). Role of Geographical Information System in tourism decision making process: A Review. Information Technology & Tourism, 15(2), 131–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-015-0025-0
35- Talebi, M., Majnounian, B., Makhdoum, M., Abdi, E., & Omid, M. (2021). Predicting of Areas with Ecotourism Capability Using Artificial Neural Network. Environmental Researches, 12(23), 55-66. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20089597.1400.12.23.5.5 [In Persian]
36- Tavosi, T., Rahimi, D., & Khosravi, M. (2014). The Site Selection of Ecotourism in Suitable Areas (Case Study: Awramanat Region). Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Joournal, 4(13), 19-41. https://gps.gu.ac.ir/article_8507.html [In Persian]
37- Ullah, K. M., & Hafiz, R. (2014). Finding suitable locations for ecotourism development in Coxs Bazar using Geographical Information System and Analytical Hierarchy Process. Geocarto International, 29(3), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2012.760005
38- UNWTO. (2021). Sustainable tourism development. United Nations World Tourism Organization. https://www.unwto.org/sustainable-development
39- Vuković, M. (2022). The application of GIS in sustainable tourism management. Economics of Sustainable Development, 6(2), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.5937/esd2202053v
40- Wearing, S., & Neil, J. (2009). Ecotourism: Impacts, Potentials and Possibilities. New South Wales: Routledge.
41- Ziaee, M., & Shojaee, M. (2010). Classification of Tourism Destinations; Analyzing a new concept in tourism spatial planning. Tourism Management Studies, 5(13), 25-46. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23223294.1389.5.13.2.2 [In Persian]