نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
کارشناس ارشد برنامه ریزی روستایی دانشگاه اصفهان
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
The main features of river ecosystem are that they are dynamic, consistent, organized from the river source to the estuary. This integrated system changes river into a varied, complex and unique system. Critical river ecosystems create a dynamic balance between variables like material, energy, space, time and variability in accordance with their environment.
Extracting too much alluvial materials (more than what can be renewed) results in destruction and collapse of river systems. It destroy their ecological unity in different ways and ultimately transfer its negative effects to the surrounding ecosystems.
Golpaygan River has been the most important resource providing sand for its surroundings for about half a century. Because of many different reasons such as limited flood current, small basin, construction of a dam, the river cannot restore even a small portion of its despoiled resources of sand and gravel.
Therefore, the river is facing irrecoverable morphologic, hydrologic and geomorphologic changes in a vast part of its central basin. This can have negative influence on groundwater resources, vegetation, soil resources, erosion and other environmental elements.
The present article endeavors to study and investigate the effects of mismanagement in the area, hoping that perhaps this results in paying more attention to the environment. To do so, it applies field study, hydrological and geomorphodynamic studies and calculates the volume of erosional sources in the river.
1- کنت، وات، (1364)، مبانی محیط زیست، ترجمه عبدالحسین وهاب‌زاده، چاپ اول، انتشارات اترک مشهد.
2- مسیبی، محمد، (1371)، بررسی حوضه آبی رودخانه گلپایگان با تأکید بر هیدروکلیما، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه اصفهان.
3- مجنونیان، هنریک، (1378)، حفاظت رودخانه‌ها، ویژگی‌های بیولوژیکی، ارزش‌های زیستگاهی و ضوابط بهره‌برداری، انتشارات سازمان حفاظت محیط زیست، تهران.
4- هوشیاری، بهنام و شادمانی، ژیلا،(1385)، اثرات زیست محیطی شن و ماسه از رودخانه‌ها (با تمرکز بر روی بیولوژیکی)، ماهنامه مهرآب، شماره 33 و 32، تهران.
5-Collins, B. and T.Dunne,(1990), Fluvial geomorpholoy and river-gravel mining: guide for planners, case studies included. Calif. Depart. Conserv., Div Mines Geol Spec pub 98.29pp.
6-Follman, E.H,(1980), Interdisciplinary overview of gravel removal. In: Woodward-Clyde Consultants, ed. Gravel removal studies in arctic and subarctic floofplain in Alaskatechnical report; pp.331-384. U.S.Fish Wildl. Serv., Biological Services Program, FWS/OBS-08/80403 4PP.
7- Franklin, J.F,, (1992) Scientific basis for new perspectives in forests and streams. In Naiman R.J., ed. Watershed management; pp.25-72Springer-Verlag,New York. 542pp. Mount St. Helens: Contrasts in artificial and natural approaches. In: Cains, JR.,ed. Renabilitating damaged ecosystems,2nd edition,pp 287-334. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.425PP.
8-Kondolf,G.M,(1994), Geomorphic and environment effects of instream gravel mining Landscape Urban Plann.28:225-243.
9-Koski, K.v.1992. Restoring stream habitats affected by logging activities. In: Thayer, G.W., ed. Restoring the mation's. MARINEenvironment;pp.343-404Maryland Sea Grant College, College Park, MD,716PP.
10-Pauley.G.B., G.L.Thomas, D.A.Marino, and D.C.Weigand,(1989), Evaluation of the effects of gravel bar scalping on juvenile salmonids in the Puyallup River drainage. Final Report to the Washington Department of Fisheries, Service Contract No,1620.Coop. Fish. Res. Until, Univ. Wash., seattle. Wa.150pp.
11-River,B., and seguier, J.,(1989), Physical and Biological effects of gravel extraction River Beds.
12-Sandecki, M.(1980), Aggregate mining in viver systems. Calif.GEOL. 42:88-94.
)