فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی اطلاعات جغرافیایی « سپهر»

بررسی ابعاد و شاخص‌های هیدروپلیتیک رودخانه‌های مرزی ایران با تأکید بر شاخص‌های راهبردی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه ژئوپلیتیک، دانشگاه فرماندهی و ستاد آجا، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران،تهران، ایران
3 عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه فرماندهی و ستاد آجا، تهران، ایران
چکیده
هیدروپلیتیک بررسی نقش آب در روابط کشورها در چهار مقیاس محلی، ملی، منطقه­ ای و جهانی است. کشور ایران با دارا بودن 26 رودخانه مرزی و وابستگی حدود 30 درصدی جمعیت کشور به آب حوضه ­های آبریز مشترک، جزء کشورهایی است که به‌شدت تحت تأثیر تحولات و تغییرات هیدروپلیتیکی در جهان قرار دارد. در این میان امنیت مناطق مرزی، به دلیل قرار گرفتن در مناطق پیرامونی و همچنین وابستگی شدید به آب رودخانه ­های مرزی بیشتر تحت­ تأثیر قرار می‌گیرد. بنابراین پژوهش حاضر با روش کیفی و رویکرد توصیفی - تحلیلی و با به ­کارگیری روش ­های دلفی، تحلیل ماتریس متقاطع (Micmac) و با استفاده از نرم ­افزار ArcGis، به بررسی هیدروپلیتیک رودخانه ­های مرزی کشور، شاخص ­ها و مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار بر آن و همچنین شاخص ­های ریسک و راهبردی پرداخته است.
با استفاده از منابع کتابخانه ­ای و همچنین بهره ­گیری از تکنیک دلفی و اجرای روش پرسش­نامه بیش از 50 شاخص تأثیرگذار بر هیدروپلیتیک رودخانه­ های مرزی شناسایی شد که در مرحله دوم و سوم دلفی نهایتاً  31 عامل مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. با تشکیل تیم خبرگی و مشورت با اساتید این 31 عامل در پنج بُعد «عوامل طبیعی، عوامل انسانی، عوامل ژئوپلیتیکی، عوامل نظامی و عوامل ژئواکونومیکی» دسته ­بندی شدند. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل ماتریس متقاطع در نرم‌افزار میک­ مک نشان­ دهنده شاخص ­های تأثیرگذار، تأثیرپذیر، هدف، مستقل، نتیجه و به­ خصوص شاخص ­های ریسک در هیدروپلیتیک رودخانه ­های مرزی ایران بوده است که در این میان شاخص ­های هدف و به‌خصوص شاخص ­های ریسک، شاخص ­های راهبردی مهم هستند. بنابراین نتایج حاصل از پژوهش نشان می دهند که؛ نیاز به آب آشامیدنی رودخانه ­های مرزی، بیکاری و مهاجرت به دلیل کمبود آب در مناطق حوضه­ های آبریز مشترک، روابط کشورهای پیرامون تحت تأثیر حوضه ­های آبریز، وجود جمعیت فراوان مردم در حوضه­ های آبریز مشترک، ساخت سد و معادن در کشورهای بالادست، موقعیت دفاعی و نظامی رودخانه­ های مرزی ایران، بهره ­برداری سیاسی و ژئوپلیتیکی از آب توسط کشورهای بالادست و فعالیت گروه­ های اشرار و تروریستی در کشورهای بالادست مهم ­ترین شاخص ­های ریسک در هیدروپلیتیک رودخانه ­های مرزی ایران هستند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Examining the dimensions and hydropolitical indicators of border rivers of Iran with emphasis on strategic indicators

نویسندگان English

Sayed Mehdi Mousavi Shahidi 1
Bahador Zarei 2
Mehdi Oriya 3
1 Assistant professor of geopolitics department. University of Aja Command and Staff, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate professor of political geography , University of Tehran, Iran
3 Member of the academic faculty of Aja Command and Headquarters University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Hydropolitics is the exploration of the role of water in the relations between countries on four scales: local, national, regional and global. With 26 border rivers and the dependence of about 30% of the country's population on the water of common watersheds, Iran is among the countries that are heavily affected by hydropolitical developments and changes in the world. Additionally, the security of the country's border areas is greatly impacted due to their peripheral location and strong reliance on water from border rivers. Hence, this research investigates the hydropolitics of Iran's border rivers, the indicators and components that influence it, and the security consequences on the border areas. The research utilizes Qualitative method and descriptive-analytic approach, employing Delphi methods, cross-matrix analysis (MICMAC), and ArcGIS software to produce maps.
Materials & Methods
Based on the purpose, this research is among the applied research and based on the method, it is among the qualitative research, with a descriptive-analytical approach and using the Delphi technique and the cross-matrix analysis method. In this research, the authors will analyze the issue by using library resources and written documents related to the topic, while describing and explaining the event, and then while studying the library resources from the questionnaire in order to identify and screen the most important Dimensions and hydropolitical indicators of Iran's border rivers, as well as the effectiveness of the indicators will be used. The statistical population of this research includes experts, custodians and elites of the country in the field of water. In this regard, due to the unlimited statistical population and the lack of official information on the number of experts and elites, it is not possible to use Cochran's formula, and the number of 20 people is considered as the statistical population in this research and they are questioned. . Due to the type of research and not knowing the full number of the statistical population, the sampling method is "targeted sampling" and the snowball sampling method. In order to analyze and analyze data and information, since this research is one of qualitative researches, in addition to the use of library sources and analysis with a descriptive-analytical approach, methods such as Delphi in order to identify dimensions and indicators, as well as the method Cross-matrix analysis will be used in future research of effective hydropolitical strategies. In this research, Arc GIS software is used for map preparation and Micmac software is used for data analysis.
Results & Discussion
The research findings reveal that more than 50 indicators affecting the hydropolitics of border rivers were identified through the use of library resources, the Delphi technique, and a questionnaire. Ultimately, 31 factors were confirmed in the second and third stages of the Delphi process. These 31 factors were categorized into five dimensions: natural factors, human factors, geopolitical factors, military factors, and geo-economic factors by forming an expert team and consulting with professors.
The results of the cross-matrix analysis in MICMAC software have shown the indicators of influential, influenceable, target, independent, result indicators, and especially risk indicators in the hydropolitics of Iran's border rivers. Among these, target indicators and especially risk indicators are important strategic indicators. The indicators of the need for drinking water from the border rivers, unemployment, and migration due to water shortage in the areas of the common catchment basins, the relations of the surrounding countries affected by the catchment basins, the existence of a large population of people in the common catchment basins, the construction of dams and mines in the upstream countries, the defense and military situation of Iran's border rivers, the political and geopolitical exploitation of water by the upstream countries, and the activities of evil and terrorist groups in the upstream countries are the most important risk indicators in the hydropolitics of border rivers of Iran.
Conclusion
Finally, the results show that the most important security consequences of the hydropolitics of border rivers on border areas are in environmental, economic, political, social, and cultural dimensions. The most important of these include ethnic tensions on both sides of the border, smuggling of goods and drugs in the border areas, joining terrorist groups and striving for independence, migration from border areas, reduction of agriculture in border areas, growth of poverty in border areas, and as a result, the growth of crime and the increase in the cost of providing security. Other consequences include ethnic crises due to spatial and ethnic ties, conflicts over water, marginalization and increase in crime, air pollution, drying up of border wetlands, respiratory problems in border areas, the emptying of borders, and the destruction of the environment in border areas.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Hydropolitics
Border rivers of Iran
Security of border areas
  1. Al-Tiyaminiya, M.(2015). "Water and the perspective of its role in the relations between Middle Eastern countries", Master's thesis, Shahid Beheshti University. (In persian).
  2. Araghchi, S.A. (2013). Water Diplomacy, From Conflict to Cooperation, World Politics, 10(3), 120-91. (In persian).
  3. Babaghibi Azghandi, A. (2010). "The future research of a new approach in the comprehensive management of urban transport", Traffic Management Quarterly, Vol. 5 (16), pp. 77-100. (In persian).
  4. Dultiyar, M.,Gray, T. (2009). Water Policy in the Middle East, translated by Rasool Afzali and Reza Al-Tayaminia, Tehran: Inter-International Publishing.
  5. Golkarmi, A., Kaviani Rad, M. (2016). The effect of water resource limitation on hydropolitical tensions (case example: Iran's central watershed with an emphasis on the Zayandeh Rood watershed), Geography and Environmental Planning Quarterly, Year 28, Series 65, Number 1. (In persian).
  6. Heydari, A. (2011). Management of water resources and wastewater recycling, drinking water supply solution for dry areas: a case study of Mashhad city, Science and Water and Wastewater Engineering Promotional Journal, third year, number 4, pages 49-64. (In persian).
  7. Ijabi, I., Kolivand, K. (2023). Analyzing the security threats of organizations' computer networks with a future research approach (case study of Ajah Air Defense Force Command Headquarters). Quarterly Journal of Defense Future Studies, Vol. 28, pp. 7-31. (In persian).
  8. Karamouz, M., Mujahidi, S.A., Ahmadi., A. (2006). Economic evaluation and determination of inter-basin water transfer exploitation policies, Geography, Q12, Vol. 32, pp. 125-155. (In persian).
  9. Kaviani Rad, M. (2018). hydropolitics; Strains and approaches. Tehran: Strategic Studies Research Institute Publications. (In persian).
  10. Kaviani Rad, M., Salmanpour, F., Nosrati, H. (2018). Analyzing the concept of water security from the perspective of political geography and geopolitics, Geopolitics Quarterly, 15th year, 1st issue, Spring . (In persian).
  11. Kaviani-Rad,M., Motaghi, A., Zarkani, S., Sadrania, H. (2018). Identifying and analyzing the effect of variables and indicators on the strategic importance of Harirud for Iran with the approach of analyzing mutual effects. Applied Research of Geographical Sciences (Geographical Sciences). (In persian).
  12. Kazemi, M., Bozorg-Haddad, O., Fallah-Mehdipour, E., & Chu, X. (2022). Optimal water resources allocation in transboundary river basins according to hydropolitical consideration. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-19.
  13. Kehl, Jenny, R. (2011). Hydropolitical Complexes and Asymmetrical power: Conflict, Cooperation and Governance of International River Systems, Journal of World-Systems Research, American Sociological Association, Volume 17, No I.
  14. Khosrowshahi, M., Kashki, M. T., Ansafi Moghadam, T. (2015). The territory of the climatological deserts of Iran. Iran Pasture and Desert Research, 16(1), 96-113. (In persian).
  15. Lowi, M. R. (1995). Water and power: The politics of a scarce resource in the Jordan River basin (No. 31). Cambridge University Press.
  16. McCaffrey, S. (2007). The Law of International Watercourses (Second Edi., p. 550). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Retrieved http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Law/PublicInternationalLaw/G eneralPublicInternationalLaw/?view=usa&ci=9780199202539
  17. Mian Abadi, H. (2018). "Political, Security and Legal Considerations in the Management of Border Rivers", International Relations Research, First Volume, No. 9, pp. 203-235. (In persian).
  18. Mirhaidar, D. (2000). Basics of political geography, second edition. Tehran: Side. (In persian).
  19. Mokhtari Heshi, H., Kaviani-Rad, M. (2018). Processing of Tehran's hydropolitics concept: water and development and sustainable development journal, 6th year, number 2. (In persian).
  20. Mustafapour, A. (2004). "Evaluation of the effects of the water transfer project from the headwaters of Karun to Rafsanjan on the environment with two methods of matrix analysis and destruction model", Master's thesis, University of Tehran. (In persian).
  21. Oxfordrefrence. Com
  22. Rai, S. P., Wolf, A. T., Sharma, N., & Tiwari, H. (2017). Hydropolitics in transboundary water conflict and cooperation. River system analysis and management, 353-368.
  23. Sadeghi, S. (2015). Hydropolitics and national security (case study: Persian Gulf countries). Strategy, 25(81), 117-144. (In persian).
  24. Safai, A., and Malek Mohammadi., B. (2014). Game theory guidelines for sustainable governance of shared water resources (case study: Lake Urmia water dispute). Ecology, 40(1 (ser. 69)), 121-138. (In persian).
  25. Selby, J.(2014). "Positivist climate conflict research: a critique." Geopolitics 19.4: 829-856.
  26. Talebi Arani, R. (2010). "Security Considerations of Hydropolitical Developments in the Northwest Region of the Country", Research Plan, Majlis Research Office. (In persian).
  27. Turton, A. R., Meissner, R., Mampane, P. M., & Seremo, O. (2004). A hydropolitical history of South Africa’s international river basins.
  28. Turton, A., & Henwood, R. (Eds.). (2002). Hydropolitics in the developing world: A Southern African perspective. , Journal of World-Systems Research, American Sociological Association, Volume 19, No I.
  29. UNESCO-IHP ISARM. (2009). Atlas of Transboundary Aquifers: Global maps, regional cooperation and local inventories. In S. Puri & A. Aureli (Eds.), World Water Week 2009, Stockholm (p. 326). Paris, France: International Hydrological
  30. Vali Qolizadeh, A. (2013). The role of water as a political tool in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Foreign Policy Quarterly 25 (2), pp. 516-499. (In persian).
  31. Varady, R. G., Albrecht, T. R., Modak, S., Wilder, M. O., & Gerlak, A. K. (2023). Transboundary Water Governance Scholarship: A Critical Review. Environments, 10(2), 27.
  32. Wolf, A. T., Natharius, J. A., Danielson, J. J., Ward, B. S., & Pender, J. K. (1994). International River Basins of the World. International Journal of Water
  33. Zaki, Y., Hamidi, A. (2021). "Identification and analysis of factors affecting the security of border areas of Aras River". International Quarterly of Geopolitics, 17(62), 118-92. (In persian).
  34. Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony–a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8(5), 435–460.